药群论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1142|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【转载】20140709 ANDA sub-Amendments and Easily Correctable Def. under GDUFA

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
一场梦 发表于 2014-10-17 12:44:21 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册  

x
【转载】20140709 ANDA sub-Amendments and Easily Correctable Def. under GDUFA(3/3)  

2014-10-16 23:02:31|  分类: FDA|举报|字号 [url=]订阅[/url]


4 p+ `1 b, z# C5 s  @) ~* @8 a, b& t7 p( V1 f* a8 k* ?! ?3 B
) `1 Z5 r! I( U. q+ L
% m; k; B9 h* ]) `$ y& s

' U& M! v- u' s- ~( f
  
0 c4 h6 [) Q: Q# N% G" Z; D% v[url=]V.  SUBMISSION OF AMENDMENTS[/url]修订的递交
0 Q& A  g7 f5 {% G  o% H
. _  m( g1 h9 E. k6 p9 A! n7 V: c

Any amendment to an original ANDA should identify on the first page of the submission that it is an amendment. To facilitate processing, FDA recommends that the applicant provide the following information on the first page of the submission:


! J; B9 k" F) y% C* n( N

任何递交的原始ANDA的修订应当在首页上明确这是一份修订.为了便于处理,FDA建议申请人在递交的首页上提供以下内容:

, _/ O' k9 A7 p- A

1.         A statement indicating whether the amendment is solicited or unsolicited


1 ~1 y6 {6 u+ v8 Z* I

2.         The amendment classification as identified in the CR letter or as proposed by the applicant based on the criteria provided in this guidance (major amendment, minor amendment, administrative amendment, delaying, or nondelaying)

7 I" i5 i7 j) Y/ J$ t

3.         The Tier classification (Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3)


" t1 x# k2 b# ]  \+ b! L) G

4.         A statement indicating whether the amendment contains any manufacturing or facilities changes

! Y2 E/ g' _& T

5.         A list of the specific review disciplines to review the amendment (Chemistry, Labeling, DMF, Bioequivalence, Microbiology, or Clinical) and the corresponding amendment Tier (Tier 1 solicited amendment or Tier 2 unsolicited amendment) for each component

0 e/ t6 w! F, L1 R( P

6.         If expedited review is requested, the statement, Expedited Review Request should be placed prominently at the top of the submission. The submission should include a basis for the expedited review request.


% }9 M, U! S# R' V% q

1.         声明该修订是主动的还是被动的;


. M! H/ |+ D6 c% O  n) d, G

2.         CR不足信中指定的修订类别,或者申请者按照本指南提供的标准提议的修订类别(重大修订,次要修订,行政修订,延迟或者非延迟的修订)


) ]& X6 o7 w" u; Z% z( J

3.         修订层次的分类(层次1,层次2,或者层次3)


# b1 p7 i+ D$ J' W

4.         提供一份声明,指出修订是否包含了任何生产或者设施的变更

! |8 O4 ^5 Z0 R+ V) R, d

5.         修订审核的具体类别列出清单(化学,标签,DMF,生物等效性,微生物学或者临床的),以及每个部分相应的修订层次(层次1的被动修订或者层次2的主动修订)


- k  c" u# L. [9 p) V- k2 p1 A7 X

6.         如果申请加速审查,需要将加速审查申请的陈述放在首页显著的位置.递交应当包括申请加速审查所需要的信息.


  i% F" R. J! Z: T0 F7 m$ }[url=]VI.       RECONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT CLASSIFICATION[/url]修订分类的复议) e/ j" {* |1 K6 D$ u
% l& q4 N+ M" U: `

An applicant may request reconsideration of FDA’s amendment classification.  If an applicant is requesting reconsideration of a CR amendment, the applicant will submit a written request for a post-CR-letter meeting[1] within 10 business days from issuance of the CR letter. The request should be sent to the application with a copy to the RPM.  The applicant should clearly state in the meeting request that it is seeking a reconsideration.  Before the meeting, the applicant will be asked to submit meeting materials.  The materials should contain information adequate to explain the nature of the request, including the following:


# }6 n$ y- O6 y

1.      A comprehensive statement of why FDA should reconsider the classification


" J1 [) X$ g9 `3 j1 y) ~

2.      A statement identifying the division or office that issued the original decision


3 r9 F% ~; i* D$ T* w' b

3.      A list of documents previously submitted to FDA that are deemed necessary for resolution

3 q+ c) k9 Y: [6 {5 L

4.      The name, title, and contact information (i.e., mailing address, email address, telephone number, and fax number) for the applicant contact for the request

, A+ P) N# o2 d+ z5 X. e! F

申请者可能会要求对FDA的修订分类进行复议.如果申请人申请CR不足信修订的复议,需要在发布CR不足信的10个工作日内递交书面的申请,申请post-CR-letter会议。该申请需要提供一份复印件给管理的项目经理(RPM)。申请人应当在会议的申请上明确声明征求复议,在会议前,申请人会被要求递交会议的材料。材料应当包含足够的信息能够解释申请的性质,信息包括以下内容:


7 v/ B- u; Z! E' @1 U

1.         综合的声明,FDA为什么应当重新考虑分类


- m/ ]# y' \* D# D

2.         提供一份声明,指出发布原始分类决定的部门或者办公室

2 L' _9 t# j4 S. c1 E* D# ?

3.         之前递交给FDA,被认为做判断需要的文件,列出一个清单


5 r5 q9 s/ R2 W' o; ?" G

4.         该申请联系人的姓名,头衔和联系信息(例如邮箱地址,电子邮箱地址,电话号码,和传真号)


% b2 t# ?- ]* M$ q$ v; P( a

The division will issue a decision about the request for reconsideration and notify the applicant of the decision within 10 business days from the date of the meeting.  If the division grants the request for reconsideration after the amendment has been submitted and a review is pending, the change in classification will not alter the goal dates assigned to the amended application. However, the application’s amendment count will be adjusted.  If the amendment has not yet been submitted, the amendment will be assigned the revised classification and corresponding goal date.  The applicant’s CR amendment should clearly identify the new classification and state that the amendment classification was changed by the division.

- s4 N% U1 O/ y- e' j  J) m9 S6 _

部门将发布该复议申请的决定并在会议之后10个工作日内通知申请人。如果部门在修订递交之后同意复议,并且还未审核修订,分类的变更不会改变已修订申请指定的目标期限。但是,申请的修订数量较被调整。如果修订还未递交,修订将被指定修改后的分类,以及相应的目标日期。申请人的CR不足信的修订应当明确指出新的类别以及声明该修订的分类由FDA部门变更。

2 T1 h6 h- s# G* G+ e! f

If an applicant wishes to request reconsideration of a change in classification that occurred after submission of the applicant’s CR amendment, the applicant should submit a request for reconsideration within 10 business days from issuance of the goal letter. The applicant should submit a written request for reconsideration to the application and a copy to the RPM.  The request should contain information adequate to explain the nature of the dispute, as described above.  The division will review the information submitted by the applicant and determine whether the request for reconsideration will be granted or denied.  The division will notify the applicant of the decision within 10 business days from the date the request for reconsideration was received.  If rendered, a change in classification will not alter the goal dates assigned to the amended application.  However, the application’s amendment count will be adjusted.


" D4 g( F4 {* y5 n/ U: l; ?: |

如果申请人希望申请CR不足信的修订递交之后变更修订类别的复议,申请人应当在发布不足信十个工作日内递交申请,申请人应当递交一份书面的复议的申请并且提供一份复印件给管理的项目经理(RPM)。该申请应当包含足够的信息来解释争论的性质,如前所述。相关部门将审核申请人递交的信息并且决定是否批准复议。相关部门将在接收复议申请的10个工作日内通知申请人所做的决定。如果宣布结果,分类的变更不会改变指定给修订申请的目标日期。但是,申请人的修订数量将被调整。


; j: _0 {6 M8 s& ?

All reconsideration decisions will be made by the discipline’s division director.  If an applicant disagrees with the outcome of the reconsideration, the applicant may initiate a formal appeal.[2] Any applicant seeking an appeal above the division level should first seek reconsideration at the division level (21 CFR 314.103).

5 l& \4 H0 S$ B- j& C* N& ~

所有复议由各学科的部门主管决定。如果申请人不同意复议结果,申请人可以发起正式上诉。任何申请人寻求部门级别以上上诉的,应当首先在部门级别进行复议(21CFR 314.103)。

6 n( u' a4 X6 A" S

* _. C* Q. g% [* ~1 ?; BAPPENDIX A — EXAMPLES OF MAJOR AMENDMENTS$ a) G2 {8 K8 ~6 s7 p( u
$ z+ ]( g& N6 l2 D# @; h

附件A-重大修订的举例

. |6 v4 [: e, C

1.   Type II Drug Master File (DMF)II类DMF

+ x' [  m, V; ]! _1 k+ B

?     Identity of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and/or equivalence to the reference listed drug (RLD) are not established没有做原料药的鉴定和/或未建立与原研药(RLD)的等效性


: f" w9 P) e- r) q2 P8 X* C( E$ I

?       Starting material is inappropriate起始物料不正确

+ Y% |2 i2 E/ Q& L6 z

?       Unqualified impurity if toxicology studies are required to qualify如果毒理学研究需要取得资格,杂质不合格

9 `% M6 M0 L$ k; E% g

?     New analytical methods are needed because method is not stability indicating, fails to adequately resolve analytes, or is not sensitive enough for its intended purpose, and significant method changes are necessary由于分析方法耐用性不好,不能有效分离化合物,或者对其预定目标不够灵敏,需要新的分析方法以及重大的分析方法变更。

; ^; s$ k0 L+ e

?     Sterility assurance or adventitious agent removal studies are not provided when required (see list for 5. Microbiology)需要时,不能提供无菌保证或附加剂去除的研究(参见清单第五条:微生物)


& c/ @/ D. J% o4 J4 Q/ D8 G

?       Reference is made to a secondary DMF that is not submitted or not in active status参考的第二份DMF未递交或者还未处于激活状态。

3 ~8 ~! h, V+ j. o" Z& l) Y

2.   Chemistry化学


- q7 y; h" m0 B8 b) s. j  i

?       Unqualified impurity levels if toxicology studies are required to qualify如果毒理学研究需要取得资格,杂质水平不合格

. U" F) D+ ^* ~4 P( M  P

?       New source of API is needed需要新的API来源


. l! Z2 R# A6 U% {" r8 y+ _

?       New site of the finished dosage form (FDF) manufacture is needed制剂生产需要新的生产场地


, }( d0 ^3 p- T, ^2 \: D

?       Unacceptable physical properties物理性质不合格

+ i- A1 J1 _$ S  C+ _$ w

?     Need for full-term stability to establish expiration dating because of failing accelerated and intermediate data加速稳定性和中间条件稳定性失败,需要进行足期的稳定性研究以建立有效期限


; N( K' N1 G4 p- x. B

?       New packaging system is needed when system is not properly delivering the proper dose包装系统不适用于剂型,需要新的包装系统


/ A8 |. r4 W, N7 v7 `/ Z' w9 D

?     New analytical methods are needed because method is not stability indicating or is not sensitive enough, and significant method changes are necessary由于分析方法耐用性不好或者不够灵敏,需要新的分析方法以及重大的方法变更


0 x4 n! x% Y# J3 C9 ~: @

?       Critical quality attributes are not identified or controlled关键质量参数未被确认或者控制


5 M2 r" k, G- x' V! \+ T( E6 _

?       Environmental assessment is not provided for plant-derived products植物来源的产品未提供环境评估

$ S. W# p" O& X2 {7 J7 S5 c# ~

?       Uncorrected DMF deficiencies DMF缺陷项未改正

- C, s5 t& u* |) k

3.  Bioequivalence生物等效性

$ q1 d5 {7 t0 s/ n9 k; h" ~7 O

?     Request for additional validation data (i.e., cross-validation of accuracy and precision in the presence of different anticoagulants)要求额外的验证数据(例如:在不同抗凝血剂中交叉验证的准确性和精密度)


* e" w% S9 d' V" a! I5 s" a* f+ X

?       Justification for Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) findings科学调查办公室(OSI)调查发现所做的判断

& v1 `4 ~0 D0 y. X

?       Questions concerning exclusion of subjects 与实验对象排斥性相关的问题

& |3 ~9 j4 G# v2 i0 G* B" `$ H

?       Request for repeating bioequivalence (BE) study(ies) 要求重复生物等效性(BE)研究


4 s, y  H* L  ^+ n  t7 m$ Q6 H

?       Request for reintegration of chromatograms要求对色谱图重新整合

' u1 c" Q- K# P, I2 p& C

?       Request for reanalysis of samples要求样品的重新检测

7 x" L0 V3 O2 C% n. x

?       Request for physicochemical data for ophthalmic products, oral solutions, injections, etc.要求眼用制剂,口服溶液和注射剂的物化数据

, }3 I7 n7 c7 O" M- U9 ]# x4 ?

?       Request for toxicological data要求毒理的数据


3 H6 }* {4 |9 h6 H

4.  Clinical临床的


. Z# Z2 x" q6 v" @& f2 W, n( N

?     The skin irritation, sensitization, and adhesion study for a proposed transdermal product showed that the proposed product was statistically significantly less adhesive than the reference product and/or failed to show that the proposed product is no more irritating than the RLD经皮给药的产品其皮肤刺激,致敏和粘附研究显示,试验药的粘附性统计学上显著少于原研药和/或不能证明比原研药刺激少。


0 |/ Z: G5 F' W8 a. `

?       The clinical endpoint BE study did not demonstrate bioequivalence of the test and reference products临床终点的BE研究未显示试验药与原研药有生物等效性


# u1 d. q2 V4 d

?       The clinical endpoint BE study is unacceptable due to incorrect endpoint selection and/or study population临床终点的BE研究不可接受,因为终点和/或研究人群的选择不正确

! [- X) s5 S$ Y

?     The clinical endpoint BE study did not demonstrate superiority of the test and reference products over placebo临床终点BE研究并未显示试验药和原研药比安慰剂优越

5 n( k- |3 {  x  M7 @3 m/ g* L

?       There is inadequate information provided to ensure the safety of the product in normal clinical use没有提供足够的信息确保药品在正常的临床使用过程中的安全性


/ l! d, t) T3 W: C! m: K

?     There is inadequate information provided to support that the safety of the proposed formulation would not differ from that of the reference product没有提供足够的信息支持试验处方的安全性与原研药没有差异


  d3 t; e7 F+ `" x$ ]

?     The surrogate endpoint (or measurement scale/questionnaire) is not generally recognized as a validated measure for the indication代替的终点(或者测量尺度/问卷调查)不是公认的适应症的验证措施


1 ^3 _2 Z% y6 P7 o* g4 K( R, Y4 g

?       The study data are not acceptable due to the concern of data integrity由于数据完整性的问题,研究数据不可接受

2 B; V  C& T9 F$ F9 a

5.  Microbiology微生物


; b. _" V9 b# {3 M/ @0 l

?      For terminally sterilized drug products, one or more of the following were not provided or not adequate:对于终端灭菌的产品,以下的一个或者多个信息未被提供或者提供不充分:

# C% R, G# ^3 i9 b' P# ]

o  Validation of production terminal sterilization process终端灭菌工艺的验证


: ?. \; q! i$ t, v, j

o  Validation of depyrogenation of product containers and closures产品容器和包装去除热原的方法验证

" v1 V/ U5 V2 g+ S% ~3 P

o  Validation of container closure package integrity包装完整性验证


( b  j! ?7 t9 `/ a

?      For aseptically filled drug products, one or more of the following were not provided or not adequate:对于无菌灌装产品,以下一个或几个信息未提供或者提供不充分

8 S7 j$ w/ G* R( {

o  Validation of the sterilizing grade filters (bacterial retention studies)消毒过滤器的验证(细菌截留研究)


. ?. q! ?+ c9 P! {. q7 l

o  Validation of the sterilization of sterile bulk drug or product contact equipment, components, containers, and closures无菌原料药的无菌验证或者与产品接触的设备,零件,容器或者包装的灭菌验证

+ l1 M+ ]$ `9 J1 g- V4 U. r

o  Validation of the depyrogenation of product containers and closures产品容器和包装除热原法的验证

( U+ W5 T) a/ S4 x; S) @

o  Validation of the aseptic filling process/line/room (media fills/process simulations)无菌灌装工艺/线/房间的验证(介质灌装/工艺模拟)

, O& O& ?2 v7 {& U

o  Validation of container-closure package integrity瓶塞包装完整性的验证

( v0 k4 Y3 Z  J' M

?      For terminally sterilized or aseptically filled drug products对于终端灭菌或者无菌灌装的产品

* y, ?$ E; }8 D

o  Relaxing an acceptance criterion or deleting any part of a specification放宽接收标准或者删除了标准中任何一部分

5 Z# F0 k9 }. j7 J. Y
% X2 r  T4 D, m2 {) C

1 c- T" `( g: Z8 xAPPENDIX B — EXAMPLES OF MINOR AMENDMENTS* Y, E" G8 _! j! Y# L' l

. U- w; g3 n& a. I: w$ E

附件B-次要修订举例


7 W& t7 o- y9 ?: s) i. D7 t4 O) ?

1.  Type II Drug Master File (DMF) II类DMF


1 g( c5 w/ ]1 @

?       Additional stability data needed需要额外的稳定性数据

: `  @/ p' F/ E$ ?, L- J; \

?       Additional in-process controls needed需要额外的中间控制


8 m+ k, ~# D6 y8 J3 h3 P0 a& Z/ y

?       Additional or tightened specifications needed for release or stability放行或者稳定性标准需要增加项目或者紧缩

3 Z. b- L$ X8 _# j

?       Method validation or verification report needed需要方法验证或者确认报告

0 r5 B$ U( j# ]2 B

2.  Chemistry化学

4 e  D$ \3 J, D- I$ R  P+ b/ w

?       First cycle DMF deficiencies 第一轮审核的DMF缺陷项

. ^6 f8 {, t3 v6 O

?       Modifications to a validated analytical method to improve performance对已验证的分析方法进行调整以提高分析能力

# U- H* z! l. u% ^5 ^* {, J

?       Supporting information needed for qualification of impurity levels, excluding new studies确认杂质水平需要的支持性信息,包括新的研究

% i/ \9 A$ ]) y5 G7 Y! n: ^& B3 \

?       Additional or enhanced in-process controls needed for the manufacturing process增加的或者增强对生产过程的中间控制


; P% M/ O! X, k% {4 j

?       Particle size distributions need to be established for drug substance, excipients and/or granulations原料药,辅料和/或颗粒需要建立粒径分布

6 }7 w& {5 E* C8 {1 C

?     Additional clarification required for scale-up planning or demonstration of product/process understanding放大计划或者产品/工艺的理解需要额外的说明


; s1 z& \& \: k1 u

?     Additional information regarding unexpected trends observed during stability studies not linked to formulation or container/closure systems稳定性研究中发现的与处方或者容器/密闭系统无关的非预期内的趋势,需要额外的信息

1 J& u, q5 w/ }# u! L( A

?     Modifications to the container/closure system to increase protection from light, water or oxidation not requiring the submission of additional studies对容器/密闭系统的调整,提高避光,防水,防氧化,需要额外的研究


3 `: t# V- g* Y3 ^# T2 ]

3.  Bioequivalence生物等效性

0 F8 B( K6 R* g5 `$ q% c$ K

?       Deficiencies that are not classified as major or ECDs will be classified as minor BE deficiencies没有被归类为主要缺陷或者ECDs的将被归类为次要的BE缺陷项


& \2 @) b7 p; y8 v

4.  Clinical临床的


& ^/ o- D( \4 {- Q- O* ~9 C

?       Deficiencies that are not classified as major or ECDs will be classified as minor clinical deficiencies没有被归类为主要缺陷或者ECDs的将被归类为次要的临床缺陷项


: f3 s1 L4 i) [: Y2 m

5.  Microbiology微生物


0 ^3 L, g+ h0 c& q7 @

?     Incomplete or missing information in an existing study that is not classified as major or ECD will be classified as minor microbiology deficiencies已有研究中不完整的或者缺失的信息,如果没有被归类为主要缺陷或者ECDs的将被归类为次要的微生物缺陷项

- w: H: A0 r; w/ e" ]: T+ I

6.  Labeling标签


/ P1 C8 H- |+ @, V

?     Deficiencies that are not classified as major or ECD will be classified as minor labeling deficiencies没有被归类为主要缺陷或者ECDs的将被归类为次要的标签缺陷项


' y. [% [/ w( m' o' T, X4 b. P# z4 k; {APPENDIX C — EXAMPLES OF EASILY CORRECTABLE DEFICIENCIES
! O) `2 c& v# b* y5 {, i4 D2 z" z7 Y2 [/ K; f& B

附件C-易改正的缺陷项(ECD)举例


7 K$ w+ p7 q' u9 N0 ?  ~5 K

1.  Type II Drug Master File (DMF) II类DMF


, W. ?2 s; ?+ l$ y5 q( A% X! h

?     Missing data points that applicant is likely to have丢失的数据,申请人可能有

. f* f7 q9 q0 K% N; c/ g

?     Inconsistencies in different sections of the application申请的不同部分有不一致

% a- Q( |" ?# _# e. r; P& D# [& o

?     Missing some details in the analytical method分析方法部分细节丢失


1 f" o" c. v! D1 e+ ~9 I

2.  Chemistry化学


! P' c% W/ V3 z  V

?      Request for a postapproval commitment (e.g., submission of data acquired during manufacture of the first three commercial batches)要求一份批准后的承诺书(例如承诺递交最先三批商业批的数据)

4 j9 b' X5 W; j6 o7 w6 q, M

?      Missing data points that applicant is likely to have丢失的数据,申请人可能有


, t8 R' z: ?- i$ {3 f1 X: g8 E. b" L

?      Inconsistencies in different sections of the application申请的不同部分不一致

# |+ }) k8 M/ b+ Q

?      Missing some details in the analytical method分析方法的一些细节丢失

9 P1 ^* K, v; P6 K

3.  Bioequivalence生物等效性

+ T+ u& T9 g7 _5 M

?      Data given in wrong format提供的数据格式错误


: F3 Y0 ~; x: m

?      Missing information and data缺失信息或者数据

1 a9 z( ~' b5 h) n+ U6 C! Q

o  Long-term stability studies长期稳定性研究


1 \* v$ O! b; Y, {9 X& ?7 E

o  Potency assay效价含量


) `8 ~( ]$ @+ ?6 o0 t  f

o  Formulations处方

3 P# T9 F, k- y- u

o  Content uniformity含量均一性

4 w6 ^8 G! T- _4 t0 _

?      Deficiencies already identified by the office as ECDs办公室已判断为ECD的缺陷项

1 l* E- r2 {  ?

o  Clarification of data already submitted对已提交数据的说明

; c3 v' _4 S: ^! o! J

o  Request for a postapproval commitment要求批准后的承诺

+ w& y% ^. Q: F" X6 c

o  Final resolution of technical issues such as finalization of specifications技术部分最终的解决例如标准的最终版

$ h8 e; `# o- T& |# L4 c

?      Requests for any of the following:要求以下任何信息:


- r& K+ F  {+ L' j

o  Analytical and/or clinical study reports for failed or pilot studies失败的或者初步研究的分析和/或临床研究报告


7 ^1 v3 l  {* u- o7 W- B2 H& N

o  Analytical run data, chromatograms, etc.分析运行数据,色谱图等

6 f- V" f. r. B# M& J

o  Case report forms病例报告表

- z9 b1 ^( _. t/ }/ |( l1 z8 ]

o  Analytical/Clinical site information such as addresses分析/临床场地的信息例如地址


. d( G2 X$ h! {- w4 K

o  Fed meal description进食研究的描述

0 V( i/ B4 W  Z

?      Components and composition of certain inks, capsule shells, etc.某些墨水,胶囊壳等的组成和成分


! q1 l- Q4 h8 X1 o& M$ w" [) z

4.  Clinical临床的

& D2 B' [6 c7 v5 r9 O

?      Any request for clarification (including clarification of statistical tables or assumptions)任何要求说明的(包括统计表格或者假设的说明)

( ]5 U! I* n- d% ?2 c; l5 F0 }+ a% ?

?      Any missing information (clinical and statistical) that the firm would be able to collect and submit within 10 business days任何缺失的信息(临床的和统计上的),公司可以在10个工作日内收集和递交。


7 R4 S4 r+ k$ r5 O8 g

5.  Microbiology微生物


8 u( [: s, y/ W( g

?      Clarification on typos or conflicting statements or information错误或者相互矛盾的声明或者信息的说明


5 E" U6 ^$ K& H

?      Misplaced information信息放置的位置错误

7 }+ j! t9 [: R; [

?      Missing Letters of Authorization (LOAs) 授权信缺失(LOAs)

, N* C# l! q6 L5 A4 u  ^9 h, {* J

6.  Labeling标签

0 ^; z3 i; X# G" c9 S

?      Drug product strengths inadequately differentiated on labels and labeling产品规格与标签上面的有区别


- y: g! ~5 a/ }! J/ V* N  C

?      Patent/exclusivity expiring before approval of the ANDA requiring the ANDA to update labeling  ANDA批准之前专利/专营权到期的需要ANDA更新标签


- x9 @+ U( x( K: e

?      Incorrect established name used in the labeling标签中使用了不正确的名字

# X! S1 q1 Y4 T. z

- Y, ?2 _- R" C4 O9 A


0 t$ t6 _& F  x3 N. o, F2 ^

APPENDIX D — AMENDMENTS FLOW CHART流程图


2 |, c4 p% d4 y0 l, v

( q8 K& F  r1 F5 c9 V6 w7 {* T3 _

4 j* N9 Y$ H& ~, S' Z- T6 [
                               
登录/注册后可看大图
5 m  I( r$ T0 D0 ?6 F- W

  
! e* Z0 r  J- g4 O

+ N( z6 h' r& u- U5 d' n6 G+ Z( g


6 e3 b0 B, l6 W5 h
( a* ^1 g: v% V# F& I6 u
3 f4 K  x- w7 u; d& c% j) i

[1] The post-CR letter meeting and any meeting held to discuss a request for reconsideration will generally be a teleconference.

, f, W' F& n0 A  q8 n7 u

8 I' v- N# R$ b4 G' d1 ^9 c

[2] The process for appeals above the division level is outlined in the draft guidance for industry Formal Dispute Resolution: Appeals Above the Division Level. Once finalized, this guidance will represent FDA’s perspective on the issue.

3 i* @% g5 e% f1 ~" _" Q( V! ^
; ^' y) d( Z7 Y0 \# r
回复

使用道具 举报

板凳
 楼主| 一场梦 发表于 2014-10-17 12:46:45 | 只看该作者
【转载】20140709 ANDA sub-Amendments and Easily Correctable Def. under GDUFA(1/3)  

2014-10-16 23:03:36|  分类: FDA|举报|字号 [url=]订阅[/url]


( W0 i1 [4 T% H  R
7 k" s  M2 _/ K! O; e

0 ~# x+ F; O9 r- T0 G( K
+ R& b3 ]6 g1 P5 J. b" O: k* `6 E# k4 h# N
  " J3 s# }$ B7 ^. _" U$ `
- j& d7 M) c! b& z

Guidance for Industry

2 [3 c0 h. G1 M* H

ANDA Submissions — Amendments and Easily Correctable Deficiencies

) X+ b8 }1 l) v( A# b& v

Under GDUFA


9 q/ Z0 b9 z; p; m% w
8 q" g1 Y+ \, n9 J* f& }& a' {% m# p9 Y  j1 g, d
' g: r0 R2 I: S" L# q) z8 b

9 A+ ?& Z' E  u* T/ l3 |

DRAFT GUIDANCE

+ [0 S# P) J" A: n

' C& u. o  ?+ w* [* }# `: M6 q/ a. h' l/ c6 x- a

This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

% W4 W, i, m% b7 B( ?# ~$ A  A
$ p( Z) \7 D+ n7 E& u) a

0 P2 Q4 t2 y; k

Comments and suggestions regarding this draft document should be submitted within 60 days of publication in the Federal Register of the notice announcing the availability of the draft guidance.  Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register.


& S" P7 `" o) B6 q& z& g8 i
. l  D5 O1 X5 t& K" A
7 \/ _+ |: [0 D; ~/ x  O- y

For questions regarding this draft document contact (CDER) Elizabeth Giaquinto 240-402-7930 or (CBER) Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development, 800-835-4709 or 240-402- 7800.

* h- a. k  k) g% S0 f# N
/ m$ C; t" y  ?/ k
5 \* P; j3 d+ a2 V- z

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services


" _: i) o- k& P. u

Food and Drug Administration

# D( K* }# h) t- B9 `/ r

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)


3 \5 F/ L5 \6 q2 L& \% K' l

Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)


( b" U3 }/ Z9 |
* {7 [; h9 J% H' @& b- a9 ]( s# ]4 c* ~

July 2014

2 `! C: d" z" p% y1 U9 f; e

Generic Drugs

) H& q8 L% ]2 m( a. J

9 p7 L2 }# G( A/ K; X) i. \
+ Q: E1 U/ v5 I) E- c5 t' h: w( h
# j. R9 p* R0 E2 m
1 j9 t2 G4 C% `8 C, h! f( g" P; ~/ q# D3 ?% A" i! Q

, l$ x/ P5 r2 T  i
  i4 P# X) E- R1 P; E1 g2 C: A4 p  `& d7 `3 G) Z" c6 R
  N8 [% j8 j/ Z' u' }: J

Guidance for Industry


/ ?6 h% ^6 D' q' u3 Z0 E8 O9 U+ f

ANDA Submissions — Amendments and Easily Correctable Deficiencies Under GDUFA


% i7 z4 u! Y5 @+ \% A+ D" ~  `+ v! I) i# P  P3 A! ~: [" H8 n
. [6 ]% f  ^, @3 q

Additional copies are available from: Office of Communications

. G, ~6 K0 L3 d$ w

Division of Drug Information, WO51, Room 2201 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research


6 u/ c' j' y! L' e9 i9 k1 c- S( h

Food and Drug Administration


* z* s. l! T- ~

10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993 Phone: 301-796-3400; Fax: 301-847-8714


. O( d- u- c0 @; ]( r1 x

druginfo@fda.hhs.gov


+ d0 F) X9 V) p% E

http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm

* d8 m/ M4 {. S2 @

' }. }5 O/ q- R0 O* f8 t6 x: e
% |& ^! M0 C5 `6 n) J

and/or


: F" l1 k7 y& ]. r! C" l5 r# a3 Y) A9 S1 C1 t3 m! n

0 q  W' p$ d1 S! \. l% ]4 k& O! a- H

Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

# Z' ?) ]) [# `9 A# C' `, }

Food and Drug Administration


& D1 z1 N" Z/ |; A1 H, W7 o. ], u, u

10903 New Hampshire Ave., WO71, Room 3128 Silver Spring, MD 20993

6 v# _) n4 X1 u2 O5 [9 w

Phone: 800-835-4709 or 240-402-7800

4 @& b2 a8 F0 B! r- F( z6 @

[url=mailtocod@fda.gov]ocod@fda.gov[/url]


) F1 J( s1 z" @/ Y( X8 o

http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm


* d3 k5 @. A( h9 I) j' E
/ b) i7 `4 l5 Q  Y. o
1 u) j. o  {8 K* X$ \
; |4 i1 |( X+ P4 d2 Y1 U( A' [# T: Q/ i/ s) I6 }. o" C' Y3 k. i
9 v1 [8 P" {( f! K) F

5 y7 b9 j% A; k: ?# O" Q
1 U, |+ n: E% z& L8 K1 P6 n( c4 O# @$ Z# r0 d& m6 e' ~$ v5 ~1 x

6 n& G+ ?5 r, k) Y+ I5 l+ C5 ]  m/ n# z, e4 g, \( {

?      U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration


% x' @8 f  `4 G9 W1 Z2 Q

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)

% }9 n3 n/ [3 t9 v& V0 ]* r; r8 F5 g* q% n2 w
  u$ ]% Q% _6 w2 D

0 h0 C7 F2 b$ E1 ?+ E1 V" b& ~

July 2014


4 J& P; n+ _, Q& g

Generic Drugs


9 K' Y. X' i: I' \* b& _$ t3 N7 Y; _2 Z7 N+ f
; N% w9 |6 ~2 T3 P  y  O

+ r( j7 o8 s; e+ x( E
; `1 [+ t' C! e4 A6 A$ l7 x% ^) \

Guidance for Industry[1]

" L7 {3 |8 B0 V7 \* |: N* t2 W( D9 J" S

ANDA Submissions — Amendments and


$ X) ]6 g$ [$ _+ A

Easily Correctable Deficiencies Under GDUFA

) t& Z9 Y' I% `' Z2 Q# Q( c

8 [4 c& {+ V6 |9 i
- y3 _2 H( f7 I) J, ]2 ^8 u4 B) k7 G/ t$ V2 u2 f  h
" C! \  K2 Z7 f
0 i! K. f; ?7 q. ?( W1 Z# \$ D' j

$ f  r. C3 E, h2 z- L
& l7 @8 E  j9 }. M9 b. u% M) e; ]
) {# `+ R" Q5 M* s- U' J

# X; a8 T( H' P( J0 E& c5 @' p, J6 j) o) G( X
# {1 r# c. w8 Z( V! C5 a
0 M- c. w. U$ P8 G; ]  e

This draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) current thinking on this topic.  It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the appropriate number listed on the title page of this guidance.

1 I3 w* L( ?" H4 g/ _% d4 s5 F! x

本指南代表FDA关于此专题的最新想法。本指南不产生或授予任何人任何权利且不对FDA或者公众有任何绑定。你可以使用另一种替代的方案,只要该方案符合法律法规的要求。如果你想要讨论另一种替代方案,请联系FDA实施该指南的员工。如果你不能识别要联系的人,请打本指南首页上列出的电话。


3 W/ N8 [, N+ a- f; Z" g) `' e# C/ V; ]' W. n7 f8 Q6 B
8 j) }" T; [! w! j! {

9 G* h( `6 o* _& h
% j1 H( X. u( oI.   INTRODUCTION简介
: e8 d9 v/ g/ |! }' H

7 x% i# O4 L& ?* G! r7 ~* n

This guidance is intended to assist applicants preparing to submit to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) amendments to abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) or prior approval supplements (PASs) under section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act),[2] by explaining how the performance metric goals established as part of the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012 (GDUFA)[3] apply to these submissions.  Specifically, this guidance does the following:

5 |* U$ k" x" e( x

?       Describes the Tier system for the different types of amendments


& W/ ~6 N$ s! D4 \/ _' d

?       Explains how different types of amendments may affect the application’s original review dates


4 x' }* b) h3 ]

?       Explains FDA’s performance metric goals based on the different amendment Tiers

# {/ y' H" ?, p) C0 f  M

?       Explains the process for submitting amendments


( _, @; D: p! i0 ]5 K

?       Describes the request for reconsideration process for FDA classification decisions


; a# K" r( g# U" T  \; P' u

本指南旨在协助申请人按照食品,药品和化妆品联邦法规(the FD&C Act),2 第505(j)部分向食品和药品监督管理局(FDA)递交仿制药申请(ANDAs)的修订或预批准补充申报(PASs),通过解释绩效指标作为2012年实施的仿制药用户费用修正案(GDUFA)的一部分如何应用于上述递交。具体来说,本指南做了以下工作:


# \) E( g) M' Y  }

?       描述针对不同类型修订的分层系统

5 ^" _2 J9 _9 J9 e% n# o" }) Z

?       解释不同类型的修订会如何影响申请的原始审核日期


/ }# V2 h# P+ U9 r

?       解释FDA基于不同修订层次的绩效指标


/ K* G) C8 I6 z4 |2 H

?       解释递交修订的过程

5 \) m1 v$ ]6 x- L1 j5 ]" a# j

?       描述对FDA分类决定申请复议的程序


* ?9 |% e7 a- w% n) |' ?  ?9 \9 b

When finalized, this guidance will replace the December 2001 guidance for industry Major, Minor, and Telephone Amendments to Abbreviated New Drug Applications[4] in consideration of the new amendment review Tier system and performance goals under GDUFA.

( ?9 v8 [% g7 x6 s% _" A2 |( |

一旦定稿,考虑到GDUFA中新的修订审核分层系统和绩效指标,本指南将替代2001年12月的工业指南仿制药申请的主要,次要和电话修订4


* Q: E  l- R3 S- \9 Z$ ?4 c; G7 ~" n# K1 F- w1 h$ N) z8 y3 n
! y8 S' ?, q# y4 o1 L4 E. N; N
9 \5 L( I& {" K/ j- F& }0 n& _7 r4 Y

( k+ X. R9 \4 }2 r& ^
! [5 U' I" U' g, _+ c/ J5 G& w& w: [2 I8 g
0 t' _  Z  Q. b4 c
. h! r" Q$ E2 P1 o
  @1 U& I8 {" ]& W2 N
5 m  p1 n# y' Q
* b+ R: ?( o8 r: F0 i  b
' e% m; [! l$ I$ G1 D: ?' c. R
- y/ f: w) ^) l) f) P

' X6 K  M! o) E; C2 V: G" s% ?4 q2 R' }* i# c) p4 M

1 h. I+ P. Y+ R7 b0 O5 D
, e6 s8 r3 e8 d$ x7 F# ]
( q6 I4 d% `( u* W9 E
% M% o. A* G5 }+ ]. B; F' i3 k0 B7 D8 y

' U1 o- a' e: H& s
- t# ?+ j; w) s+ U/ P! N1 v( ]( {
5 J/ f$ R! U$ Z" y) r: r8 x( m3 _4 d
$ G; x( ^1 L* q4 c8 [, G0 D& l' R$ ~' ]1 ^) x% d

FDA’s guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited.  The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.


! F5 ^, l. c1 y! ?

FDA指南,包括本指南,不产生法律上的强制执行的责任.但是,指南代表了FDA当局对该专题最新的想法,应仅作为建议,除非引用了具体的法律法规要求.指南中使用到的单词“should”代表建议或推荐的意思,并非强制。


! n" v1 X4 @9 Q" f/ y1 ^9 [* lII. BACKGROUND背景/ ~1 B( z) U2 H1 u+ H5 o

% _6 P* S  k6 i+ K7 \: M

On July 9, 2012, GDUFA was signed into law by the President.[5] GDUFA is designed to speed the delivery of safe and effective generic drugs to the public and reduce costs to industry. GDUFA is based on an agreement negotiated by FDA and representatives of the generic drug industry to address a growing number of regulatory challenges. GDUFA aims to put FDA’s generic drug program on a firm financial footing and ensure timely access to safe, high-quality, affordable generic drugs. GDUFA enables FDA to assess user fees to fund critical and measurable enhancements to the performance of FDA’s generic drugs program and to bring greater predictability and timeliness to the review of generic drug applications.


6 A5 T/ [. h* Y3 v

2012年7月9日GDUFA由总统签署成为法律。5 GDUFA是为了使公众能更快获得安全有效的仿制药,降低行业成本。GDUFA是基于一份由FDA和仿制药行业代表商讨达成的协议,该协议用于应对越来越多的监管挑战。GDUFA的目标是将FDA仿制药项目放在一个公司的经济角度,确保及时向市场提供安全,高品质,实惠的仿制药。GDUFA使得FDA可以评估用户费用,资助FDA仿制药项目关键重大的改进措施,为仿制药申请设定可预期性和时限性.


9 ], |& @+ u/ B3 l4 @3 [/ Y2 h

In accordance with a Commitment Letter[6] that accompanied the legislation, FDA agreed to certain performance goals and procedures for the review of amendments submitted electronically to original ANDAs and PASs filed on or after October 1, 2014. The performance goals do not apply to amendments submitted on or after October 1, 2014, if they amend original ANDAs or PASs submitted before October 1, 2014.


7 m- ^. R7 e1 A* G. a

根据伴随立法的一封承诺信6,FDA同意某些针对2014年10月1日当日或之后存档的原始ANDAs和PASs电子递交修订的审核程序和绩效目标.如果修订文件在2014年10月1日或之后递交,但是用于修订2014年10月1日之前递交的原始ANDAs和PASs,绩效目标将不适用于这些修订.

/ E& \3 E2 l7 t  Q

For purposes of FDA’s performance goals, the Commitment Letter classified amendment types into Tiers, which have associated performance metric goals, some of which will extend the applications original review date. Each Tier has corresponding performance metric goals, ranging from a 3-month review clock to no goal date, depending on the amendment’s classification.  The Tier system takes the following factors into consideration:


0 J3 X% R' c/ n) J( N. o

?       Whether an amendment is solicited or unsolicited


" I! L7 K6 v* ]/ j7 `7 r" W

?       Whether it is major or minor


( A+ t6 d* u& R) U$ C# l. \

?       The number of amendments submitted to the ANDA or PAS


: F- \" x1 q& u( t* j4 Z0 X* W( V

?       Whether an inspection is necessary to support the information contained in the amendment


4 y6 t% T/ d/ t! [: \" b! l

为了完成FDA的绩效目标,承诺信将修订类型分层,与绩效指标的目标相关联,某些会延迟原始申请的审核日期.每一层都有相对应的绩效指标,根据修订的分类,从3个月的审核期限到无期限.分层系统的建立考虑了以下的因素:


" v" r, S4 k0 J1 D: x9 @1 @5 y9 L

?       修订是主动的还是被动的

3 Q, V% ]2 a0 @( S2 i! N' M

?       修订是重大的还是次要的

; j- e( ]& l5 p3 M

?       ANDA或者PAS递交的修订数量

" {9 K- R8 D/ A/ S

?       是否需要对修订包含的信息进行检查


8 }. I$ \" r+ u$ y+ N, K# ~5 C, h% h) f! K4 c

Performance metric goals establish predictability in FDA’s review process. The Tier system creates strong incentives for applicants to submit high-quality original submissions. Incomplete or poor-quality applications often result in multiple review cycles that extend or eliminate the review clock altogether.  For example, if an applicant must submit a second major amendment to an application, that application loses its review goal date. Applicants are strongly encouraged to submit complete, high-quality original applications, making later amendments unnecessary.

+ l9 b7 f; v- V, d2 i% p

绩效指标建立了FDA审核进程的可预测性.分层系统建立了强有力的激励措施,鼓励申请人递交高质量的原始递交文件.申请不完整或者质量差往往导致多个审核周期,将一起延迟或者取消审核期限.例如,如果一个申请人必须递交另一个重大的申请修订,那么该申请将失去审核的目标期限.强烈建议申请人递交完整的,高质量的原始申请,以避免后期的众多修订.

+ F9 V9 w$ u% H9 h/ R7 t6 {
III.       CATEGORIES OF GDUFA AMENDMENTS    GDUFA修订的分类
* V' C0 C, x: \! P+ V

+ |) ^# a& i2 [9 J% R4 B

FDA’s performance goal obligations under GDUFA start when an amendment is submitted to FDA. This is the date the amendment arrives in the appropriate FDA electronic portal.[7] As described in the Commitment Letter, the performance goals identified in this guidance apply only to those amendments submitted to ANDAs that have been submitted in or after fiscal year (FY) 2015 (on or after October 1, 2014).


- L- M# S  v1 ~5 K" v' }

当修订递交给FDA,FDA将根据GDUFA开始履行绩效目标的义务。该日期指的是修订到达FDA适当的电子门户的日期。7 根据承诺信的描述,本指南中定义的绩效目标仅适用于那些在财政年度(FY)2015年或之后递交的ANDA文件的修订(2014年10月1日或之后)。

5 F9 X( R, ^, M$ i3 L

Descriptions of major and minor in this guidance apply only to the classification of major and minor amendments and are distinguishable from other major or minor issues that may be identified by FDA staff (e.g., a filing deficiency that is identified after an ANDA is submitted by the applicant, but before it is received by FDA and assigned for review). The following table highlights the three Tiers of solicited and unsolicited amendments with their respective performance review goals. As indicated, amendments may add review time to the original ANDA review goal date, but in no case do amendments shorten the original goal dates. [8]More specific definitions are provided in the sections following the table.

. p. M; n4 k, A# @5 G: T

本指南中描述的重大或者次要仅适用于重大和次要修订的分类,并且区分于其他可能由FDA员工定义的重大或者次要问题。(例如,一个文件归档的缺陷在ANDA由申请人递交之后FDA接收和指定审核之前被确认)。以下表格突出显示了主动和被动修订的三个层次以及它们各自的绩效目标。如表格所示,在原始ANDA审核目标日期的基础上,修订可能增加审核时间,但是不可能缩短原来的目标期限。8 详见以下表格


6 s/ ]- `5 R2 U8 Y$ N
) u+ r5 {; ?& U0 N8 F% [9 N: j# U- d6 X) T
" v, X4 ~" E' }- f
) g6 v! I6 v4 C8 t0 W
( f/ T0 o/ X) n: @$ g3 t8 o) n) k

, x2 o5 U$ o$ t
3 W; O. `: e8 x" ^4 t. `7 b
' ~/ r2 o$ H" U. L! i( _' l( O
9 n1 Z/ t, }. T0 O* ]& E8 p0 P: k$ h+ r' T# Z% c

4 Z  K0 N) s3 Z2 X
/ g. g$ s6 A/ {& f
' D/ q1 `4 x+ m8 l$ m: K! c" w; [6 Z- I) _$ r% K
2 z4 l. @$ o& J2 Z$ y2 U: U7 W
! Q3 E: C+ m4 Y  o
7 `# v/ ~- f7 g

9 C$ Y& D" V) g3 V; R8 o5 U+ \# E4 K$ s3 _

" R$ X/ ]1 U6 E: n& }, g, w
. @2 Y$ c* t! ?* W+ P1 q/ S, p
2 j! I9 C5 b7 \- i; J  T5 |- b
: O3 Q- {* O8 \* e1 d" d4 @7 i8 L+ o" E

" V' [  _" L) ?& C6 ?% m
8 @& d6 h' Y& g9 U( X1 m
" n* j: e6 P2 M% F! |( {

/ _. u& R; ^# q- M2 }, ^# n

Solicited Amendment Goals

5 W; d% ?" B: C8 {$ Z" t. Q- K8 D

被动修订

0 A9 N' F2 x* O7 e, x' G

Unsolicited Amendment Goals

1 {0 g' a* I% s% p/ b9 q  S

主动修订


: V& H, M6 N" Q4 I7 g: u5 H

TIER 1


6 j. Q( v7 ]0 H

层次1


6 f( B" l3 _" |. N

1st Major: 10 months

  Z8 v% i& y# t' C: Z0 l0 Y4 B9 T

1st – 3rd Minor: 3 months*


( q0 ?) u+ ^, y6 [: Q; W

4th – 5th Minor: 6 months*

& j$ v+ Y$ N0 M/ S

Delaying action or otherwise would eventually be solicited: 3 months*

7 y8 e$ W# \. A6 k( o

TIER 2


! x0 N' {/ G# M0 P- y

层次2


* l! V( |% r8 d' i( J

N/A

6 P9 J# ^' \- w0 q% M

Amendment not arising from “delaying action”: 12 months


6 X! t6 d$ ?2 q& W2 L6 U

TIER 3

: c7 @+ h9 X' u$ k# u

层次3

$ C6 S' d6 H# m# ]

≥ 2nd Major: No goal


& U5 b8 ?0 x& S) D6 I9 f! V$ M

≥ 6th Minor: No goal

2 v/ m% |7 E' L# K# K

N/A

  a& |) n! p, M0 I: H

*10 months if inspection required


5 |; y2 ?. s0 s( C6 l9 K4 I  s( S5 X3 z5 u; S

" q8 e+ K( D& I7 G4 N1 J  v2 X
% v+ F) X* d" z( V, zA.       What Is a Solicited Amendment?什么是被动修订
" S) X, k* K: }/ K8 ]. Z

6 `) v( M$ P! ?8 J

A solicited amendment is a submission made by an applicant in response to a complete response letter (CR) issued by FDA. After completing a technical review of an ANDA, FDA may issue a complete response (CR) letter identifying deficiencies from review disciplines and requesting certain information from the applicant to correct those deficiencies. The applicant’s response to FDA’s CR letter is a solicited (nongratuitous) amendment. Solicited amendments are classified as either Tier 1 or Tier 3. (See section IV of this guidance for the performance goals associated with the Tiers.) Solicited amendments are classified as either a major amendment, a minor amendment, or an easily correctable deficiency (ECD).

7 b; T- Z5 Z0 Z7 M' m# ^; J+ _

被动修订指的是申请人回复FDA发布的CR不足信所递交的修订。在对一份ANDA完成技术性审核之后,FDA可能发布一份CR不足信指出审核过程发现的缺陷项以及要求申请人提供的信息用来改正这些缺陷项。申请人对CR不足信的回复就是一份被动修订(非无理由的)。被动修订被分类为层次1或者层次3.(参见本指南IV部分与层次相关联的绩效目标)。被动修订被归类为重大修订,次要修订或者易改正的缺陷项(ECD).


8 s% J  o% I. C1.   What is a major amendment?什么是重大修订?5 K9 U, V/ I2 k6 e3 S" M

+ H% X. I$ N( H6 ~/ Y3 t

Major amendments contain a substantial amount of new data or new information not previously submitted to or reviewed by FDA, requiring, in FDA’s judgment, a substantial expenditure of FDA resources.  In general, the type, quantity, or complexity of data contained in a major amendment requires a lengthy review by FDA, and consults from other divisions or offices may be required to complete the review.  For example, a major amendment could contain a new analysis or a major reanalysis of studies previously submitted. Examples of major amendments are those that contain a new batch, a new analytical method, a new bioequivalence study, or a new validation method to support approval of the pending application.

( D9 N3 ?8 ~7 r& a2 D+ U9 J. r

重大修订包括大量的之前未递交给或未被FDA审核的新的数据和信息,根据FDA的判断,需要大量FDA资源的支出。一般来说,重大修订中包含的数据的类型,数量和复杂性需要FDA进行冗长的审核,并且需要咨询其他分部门或者办公室来完成审核。例如,一个重大修订可能会包含对之前所递交研究的一些新的分析或者一个重要的再分析。重大修订的例子包括一个新的批次,一个新的分析方法,一个新的生物等效性研究,或者一个新的验证方法来支持待批准申请的批准。

/ L1 K# g0 H8 E

The first solicited major amendment is classified as Tier 1; any solicited major amendment subsequent to the first is classified as Tier 3. Appendix A of this guidance contains a nonexhaustive list of deficiencies, categorized by discipline, that are generally classified as major amendments.

" G, d+ M( ?; a1 ~

第一个被动的重大修订被划分为层次1;随后的其他被动的重大修订被划分为层次3。本指南附件A包含了一份不详尽的通常被划分为重大修订的缺陷项清单,按照学科进行分类。

0 @6 I! \5 ?+ P' t
2.   What is a minor amendment?什么是次要修订
) @% N" o( T: P- a2 t- U
% }: G! t; R4 `: y* S: @

FDA review of a minor amendment requires, in FDA’s judgment, fewer FDA resources than are necessary to review a major amendment, but more than are necessary to review the information submitted in response to an ECD.  An example of a minor amendment is a submission to address missing information that would not require new studies. The first through fifth solicited minor amendment is classified as Tier 1; any solicited minor amendment subsequent to the fifth minor amendment is classified as Tier 3. Appendix B of this guidance contains a nonexhaustive list of deficiencies, categorized by discipline, that are generally classified as minor amendments.

7 |' d* X4 A2 e- r+ m7 c4 c

根据FDA的判断,FDA对于次要修订的审核相比较于审核一份重大修订需要的FDA资源要少,但是相比较于审核一份回复ECD所递交的信息需要的FDA资源要多。例如递交的修订是用以处理遗漏信息但是不需要做新的研究的就是一个次要修订.第一个至第五个被动的次要修订被划分为层次1;第五个之后被动的次要修订被划分为层次3.本指南的附件B包括了一份不详尽的通常被划分为次要修订的缺陷项清单,按照学科进行分类。


# {0 \3 v4 Y+ W3 Q3.   What is an easily correctable deficiency (ECD)?什么是易改正的缺陷性?6 u0 M3 p* a0 F
, l3 @' A" a3 Z

FDA review of information submitted in response to an ECD requires, in FDA’s judgment, a modest expenditure of FDA resources. An applicant should be able to respond to an ECD quickly as the applicant should already possess or be able to quickly retrieve the information needed for an adequate response to an ECD. ECDs routinely include requests for clarification of data already submitted, requests for postapproval commitments, or final resolution of technical issues. ECDs do not extend the current goal date. Appendix C of this guidance contains a nonexhaustive list of deficiencies, categorized by discipline, that are generally classified as ECDs.


; N) D+ I2 [& a. W- p

根据FDA的判断,FDA对于回复ECD所递交信息的审核,需要FDA支出适度的资源。由于该申请人应当已经拥有或者能够快速检索到能够充分回复ECD所需要的信息,申请人应当能够快速回复ECD。ECDs通常包括对已递交数据进行澄清的要求,批准后承诺的要求,或者对技术问题的最终解决的要求。ECDs不会延迟现有的目标期限。本指南附件C包含了一份不详尽的通常被划分为ECDs的缺陷项清单,按照学科进行分类。

$ \. p5 C) Y( \$ y" J
[url=]B.              [/url]What Is an Unsolicited Amendment?什么是主动修订?
5 k# b0 Y8 n; J( w% n5 S# x0 [

, q. f% m, p+ g- P

An unsolicited (gratuitous) amendment is submitted on the applicant’s own initiative and not in response to FDA’s CR letter.  Unsolicited amendments are categorized as either delaying or nondelaying. All delaying unsolicited amendments are classified as Tier 1 amendments.[9] All non-delaying unsolicited amendments are classified as Tier 2 amendments.


& E$ ~' H4 w1 d9 w( K  r

一份主动(无理由)的修订是申请人主动递交而不是对FDA CR不足信的回复。主动修订被归类为延迟的或者非延迟的。所有延迟的主动修订被划分为层次1的修订9。所有非延迟的主动修订被划分为层次2的修订。


+ y7 A# o2 ?" ?8 b7 [5 {5 q6 k1.   What is a delaying amendment?什么是延迟修订?1 i$ F+ `' c% \+ F- g$ p/ u) H
& m3 e" s$ o9 C7 n) u7 D

Delaying amendments[10] address actions by a third party that would cause delay or impede application review or approval timing and that were not a factor at the time of submission.[11] These kinds of amendments might contain information that FDA would otherwise ask for as a result of post ANDA submission reference listed drug (RLD) changes or changes to the drug master file (DMF).  For example, delaying amendments include applicant submissions to address:


+ B. r* X  P3 M! f  g- y! _

?      Changes to the RLD’s labeling or updates to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) monograph

; n( w5 T) {& d9 f; ^% G4 p( a

?      Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) and REMS modifications


& m8 j: M4 x. N9 ?

?      Generic approval requirements reflected in citizen petition responses issued by FDA[12]

( [$ |9 k8 B' L! a: o$ ^

As stated in the Commitment Letter, FDA has broad discretion to determine what constitutes a delaying event caused by actions generally outside of the applicant’s control, taking into account facts and information supplied by the ANDA applicant.[13] Unsolicited amendments that are in response to a delaying action or that FDA would eventually solicit are classified as Tier 1 delaying amendments.[14]Delaying amendments do not add to the count of major or minor amendments for the purpose of classification.

9 P+ f- ~  ?+ w1 ?$ }6 M

延迟修订10由第三方解决问题,将延迟或者阻碍申请的审核或者批准的及时性,这些问题在递交时还不存在。11这一类的修订可能包含因ANDA递交后对照制剂(RLD)变更或者药品主文件(DMF)变更FDA另外要求的信息。例如,延迟修订包括申请人递交信息以解决:


, |9 y# g6 p* g/ S# e

?       RLD的标签变更或者美国药典(USP)各论的升级


) B+ x* q) b' a2 `8 p7 Q

?       风险评估和减少策略(REMS)或其修订

( y, A( M! e3 Q$ ^' _* [# e

?       体现在FDA发布的公民请愿回复里的通用的批准要求12

+ v* D: c- R+ C8 [4 ^1 o. ?( \* Y# p

根据承诺书的描述,FDA拥有自主决定权来判定什么是延迟性事件,延迟性事件通常是因为申请人控制范围外发生的事件引起,FDA进行判断时将考虑到事实和ANDA申请人提供的信息。13作为延迟性事件回复的主动修订或者FDA最终将要求的修订被划分为层次1的延迟性修订。14延迟性修订为了分类不计入重大或者次要修订。

/ I) @3 p0 V8 G. }  B' s: F7 M2 w

/ D4 }9 i3 K' ~# ?# Y. ?. K6 q8 t2.   What is a nondelaying amendment?什么是非延迟修订?( ?" C. X& k# ]' y; |
6 s5 i7 s0 P! A# T9 S1 a

Nondelaying amendments are unsolicited amendments that contain information that is not requested by FDA and is not the result of changes to the RLD or USP monograph, changes to the RLD labeling, a REMS and REMS modification, or generic approval requirements reflected in citizen petition responses issued by FDA. Examples of nondelaying amendments include submission of new data to address an original incomplete data submission or new information such as the addition of a new strength of the product or a new manufacturing facility. Nondelaying amendments are classified as Tier 2 amendments.

8 T5 d  F& k/ K4 F  e/ D. G

非延迟修订属于主动修订,其包括的信息并不是FDA要求,并且不是因为RLD或者USP各论变更,RLD标签变更,REMS或者其修订,或者体现在公民请愿回复中的通用的批准要求而进行的修订。非延迟修订的例子包括递交新数据以修订一份原始数据不完整的递交,新的信息例如产品增加新的规格或者增加新的生产设施。非延迟修订被划分为层次2的修订。

7 K# Y' k5 I5 O0 Q8 A" R: Y
[url=]C.       What Is an Administrative Amendment?[/url]什么是行政修订?; Q  ^! K8 Y2 a  T, Q

. l9 ?& _4 i3 t

Administrative amendments are routine in nature and do not require scientific review. Requests for final approval with no scientific changes to the ANDA, patent amendments,[15] and general correspondence submitted by applicants are generally considered administrative amendments. Administrative amendments do not affect the goal dates for the application and, as a result, are considered neither Tier 1, Tier 2, nor Tier 3 amendments.


7 i) L3 y) r( B$ v( j: w

行政修订本质上是常规修订不需要科学性审核。ANDA最终批准非科学性变更的要求,专利修订15,和申请人递交的普通信件一般被认为是行政修订。行政修订不会影响申请的目标期限,因此不被划分为层次1,层次2或者层次3.

3 z& e7 z) C' j) q3 j' L- @
[url=]IV GDUFA PERFORMANCE METRIC GOALS FOR AMENDMENT TIERS[/url]针对修订层次的GDUFA的绩效指标
  ]" V& u* ~$ i+ P7 A( `6 c
[url=]A.       What Are Amendment Tiers?[/url]什么是修订层次?' ^& `# Y& v# g/ l: ~8 w; L# x) E

: H( Q0 g7 E) X( ~1 t: L

The Commitment Letter outlines the performance metrics for amendments. As explained in the Commitment Letter, all amendment goal dates are incremental,[16] and the time periods specified are calculated from the date of submission of the amendment. Review time is added to the original ANDA review goal date, but in no case do amendments shorten the original goal dates.[17] Amendments are grouped as Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3. The Tier type determines how review goals apply to the amendments.[18]


7 F* c6 m3 [# e6 e7 Q+ ~

承诺信概括了修订的绩效指标。按照承诺信的解释,所有修订的目标期限是增长的,16,并且指定的时间段是按照修订递交日期计算得来的。审核时间在原来ANDA审核的目标日期上增加,但是修订不会缩短原来的目标期限。17修订被分组为层次1,层次2或者层次3.层次类型决定了审核目标如何应用到修订中。18

4 j1 p9 Q+ K% D% z. A: c# X7 X
1.   What is a Tier 1 amendment?什么是层次1的修订?! A- l8 ]' J  @( V
. V4 N5 L8 T4 ?, P

Tier 1 amendments include the first solicited major amendment, the first five solicited minor amendments, and all delaying amendments.[19]

. T4 b+ A7 f1 c

层次1的修订包括第一个被动的重大修订,前五个被动的次要修订,和所有延迟修订。19


5 D9 Q$ z% a9 J5 k2.   What are the performance metric goals associated with Tier 1 amendments?与层次1修订相关的绩效指标是什么?' i  R# e! @8 j  y6 q; p

1 a8 `, R9 @+ P  u  u

FDA commits to reviewing and acting[20] on a certain percentage of first major amendment submissions within a certain time period from the date of submission.[21]   The percentages and time periods vary by FY cohort depending on the fiscal year in which the original ANDA or PAS was submitted.  The GDUFA program is structured based on cohorts of submission dates corresponding to the 5 fiscal years to be covered in the program. The year-3 cohort refers to the dates of submissions made electronically in FY 2015; the year-4 cohort refers to submissions made electronically in FY 2016; the year-5 cohort refers to submissions made electronically in FY 2017.[22]

: d0 J* g1 y. G

?       FDA will review and act on 60% of first major amendment submissions within 10 months from the date of submission for the year-3 cohort.


9 ~- F0 c" z8 U$ H

?       FDA will review and act on 75% of first major amendment submissions within 10 months from the date of submission for the year-4 cohort.

) ~' w* G  a2 K2 n* l

?       FDA will review and act on 90% of first major amendment submissions within 10 months from the date of submission for the year-5 cohort.

% @* |4 I" J" R' p5 |7 k

FDA承诺自递交之日起在一段时间内将对一定比例的第一个重大修订递交文件进行审核和处理。21 比例和时间段根据财政年有所变化,取决于财政年原始ANDA和PAS的递交情况。GDUFA计划是根据递交日期建立的,与计划中覆盖的5个财政年保持一致.第三年指的是电子递交日期在财政年,第四年指的是电子递交的日期在财政年2016,第五年指的是电子递交日期在财政年2017.22

  E* ^8 V7 b* K

?       FDA将在第三年自递交之日起的十个月内审核和处理60%第一个重大修订

& q/ v5 p) h, b  y; \

?       FDA将在第四年自递交之日起的十个月内审核和处理75%第一个重大修订

% x/ i$ H& o" I8 F: Q0 W- @5 Y0 X# g& C

?       FDA将在第五年自递交之日起的十个月内审核和处理90%第一个重大修订

  P% d5 @# b; X* F; I3 h6 Z6 K+ X

Similarly, FDA commits to reviewing and acting on a certain percentage of minor amendment submissions within a certain time period from the date of submission. The percentages and time periods vary by fiscal year and depend on the total count of amendments submitted to an application.


& v6 W. p3 H. N/ `/ T

同样地,FDA承诺在递交之日起在一段时间内对一定比例的次要修订进行审核和处理。比例和时间段根据财政年有所变化,取决于财政年一份申请所递交的修订的总数量。

) t: A$ l# z: V1 G- B

First Through Third Minor Amendment Submissions:


- n0 \" w. ~7 P0 ~  ^) K% m

?       FDA will review and act on 60% of first through third minor amendment submissions within 3 months from the date of submission for the year-3 cohort.


6 f1 P( o0 t& {/ D: H; q7 y4 G

?       FDA will review and act on 75% of first through third minor amendment submissions within 3 months from the date of submission for year-4 cohort.

# e7 E- h4 Y% d" t9 m/ y

?       FDA will review and act on 90% of first through third minor amendment submissions within 3 months from the date of submission for the year-5 cohort.

2 ~/ a1 @# X' B6 K0 n

第一个至第三个次要的修订:


- B+ K) {  [; \  e

?       FDA将在第三年自递交之日起三个月内审核和处理60%第一至第三个次要修订

: z2 a5 v* S' V: T2 \$ a

?       FDA将在第四年自递交之日起的三个月内审核和处理75%第一至第三个次要修订

7 m5 W/ I, ~( p7 G

?       FDA将在第五年自递交之日起的三个月内审核和处理90%第一至第三个次要修订


+ Q( e6 W' \7 Q

Fourth and Fifth Minor Amendment Submissions:


+ m1 Y" P$ ]* Z' K: n# l7 ]

?       FDA will review and act on 60% of fourth through fifth minor amendment submissions within 6 months from the date of submission for the year-3 cohort.


7 G6 h$ F0 W" S0 A

?       FDA will review and act on 75% of fourth through fifth minor amendment submissions within 6 months from the date of submission for year-4 cohort.


8 M0 K) H6 f' q' R

?       FDA will review and act on 90% of fourth through fifth minor amendment submissions within 6 months from the date of submission for the year-5 cohort.

' v2 A2 {5 g, d' l# O: F4 L; J" b

第四和第五个次要修订:

4 d* u$ `) m; [. k: D  A2 F

?       FDA将在第三年自递交之日起的六个月内审核和处理60%第四至第五个次要修订


& W$ e/ ^5 \2 ~) O0 w( X1 V

?       FDA将在第四年自递交之日起的六个月内审核和处理75%第四至第五个次要修订

7 r* p; R+ |3 ^; r# K, i

?       FDA将在第五年自递交之日起的六个月内审核和处理90%第四至第五个次要修订

# y3 v- X* P* {

Exception:


% @9 }8 H/ {. w7 |

?       Any Tier 1 amendment requiring an inspection has a 10-month metric.


# J  S  ]/ }( y! J

例外:


+ b$ x$ i- G% O2 |

?       任何需要检查的层次1的修订是10个月的指标。

4 r8 }  D6 }( z' W' q

FDA’s goal for review of a delaying amendment is 3 months, unless the amendment raises issues for which an inspection may be required, in which case the goal is 10 months.

# R+ K: p0 `% _

FDA审核延迟修订的目标时间是3个月,但是如果修订提出了问题需要进行检查,该目标时间为10个月。

% q3 B1 |$ \; Z$ v$ g- a$ G6 W
3.   What is a Tier 2 amendment?什么是层次2的修订?; g6 I  c  C0 G
3 F- u9 c" B  M8 q$ y# P

Tier 2 amendments include all unsolicited amendments that are not classified as Tier 1 delaying amendments.[23]

( d6 h8 S, K' F* s+ p: N6 S

层次2的修订包括所有未被划分为层次1延迟修订的主动修订。23


2 [2 H& H0 ?. h3 S4.   What are the performance metric goals associated with Tier 2 amendments?与层次2相关的绩效指标是什么?$ m* g1 A! I# n( |6 b- M2 G

8 }/ @; l- n# X0 @" N

FDA commits to reviewing and acting on a certain percentage of Tier 2 amendment submissions within a certain time period from the date of submission. The percentages and time periods vary by FY cohort.

0 o5 n8 e# M& e! }9 x

?       FDA will review and act on 60% of Tier 2 amendment submissions within 12 months from the date of submission for the year-3 cohort.

: u- F; n3 s+ L+ S7 G

?       FDA will review and act on 75% of Tier 2 amendment submissions within 12 months from the date of submission for year-4 cohort.

( ]7 n  K: ~( a; M4 g2 x

?       FDA will review and act on 90% of Tier 2 amendment submissions within 12 months from the date of submission for the year-5 cohort.

) D' d- z. N( b6 k

FDA承诺自递交之日起在一定期限内审核和处理一定比例的层次2的修订递交文件。比例和周期随着财政年有所变化.

" o4 Z/ ~* S; i# x: d

?       FDA将在第三年自递交之日起的12个月之内审核和处理60%的层次2的修订

! h2 @* y! I, u7 ?

?       FDA将在第四年自递交之日起的12个月之内审核和处理75%的层次2的修订

2 S' F+ a" _$ l! o0 z+ H

?       FDA将在第五年自递交之日起的12个月之内审核和处理90%的层次2的修订


9 E" A- x( I; d3 m5.   What is a Tier 3 amendment?什么是层次3的修订?
4 o' n9 ^4 c1 o, O5 b' T; p
/ m& A% A& p5 [3 |3 a: V

Tier 3 amendments include all solicited major amendments subsequent to the first major amendment and all solicited minor amendments subsequent to the fifth minor amendment.

" x; O7 B- y" C% t- N

层次3的修订包括第一个之后的所有被动的主要修订以及第五个之后的所有被动的次要修订。


. ?+ n- b' ?/ E: f/ G' _' Q& d6.   What are the performance metric goals associated with Tier 3 amendments? 与层次3修订相关的绩效指标是什么?
4 Y. ~6 z( f3 `! }8 y

! b5 F' ?0 T% @9 X+ O

There are no GDUFA performance goals for Tier 3 amendments.

针对层次3的修订GDUFA没有建立绩效目标
# z' c7 b  S" G3 A9 R) n! v% h
% z/ p" b% G9 M; o2 h, ]
3 s! m/ E0 L0 \! j* {

3 y8 @7 ^2 ]( r9 V4 c
$ H0 j4 y* O  E! o: s1 M/ N

8 b1 q) [% C* A1 U. r4 W

[1] This guidance has been prepared by the Office of Generic Drugs in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at FDA in cooperation with the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER).


$ ?* N2 z( r* {8 r: ?7 [

[2] See 21 U.S.C. 355(j).


8 f" v( F; |! C

[3] See also the draft guidance for industry ANDA Submissions — Prior Approval Supplements Under GDUFA. When finalized, the guidance will represent the FDA’s current thinking on this topic. Examples of amendments submitted to ANDAs in this guidance also apply to amendments to PASs.

/ C, r/ ^. X; h& r0 r

[4] The guidances referenced in this document are available on the FDA Drugs guidance Web page at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.We update


2 ]4 m& b' T! S+ m! b5 Z5 S5 M- G9 A/ h3 r

guidances periodically. To make sure you have the most recent version of a guidance, check the FDA Drugs guidance Web page.


. y5 w, v4 b; j6 n

[5] Public Law 112-144, Title III.

4 s$ H' I. L' y6 x0 P+ p6 Q
9 s0 i9 w0 I- b4 M, G* Y

[6] GDUFA: Human Generic Drug Performance Goals and Procedures Fiscal Years 2013 through 2017 (Commitment Letter), available athttp://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/GenericDrugUserFees/UCM282505.pdf.


) E/ }! F+ Q* {  D& @5 T6 S3 p( W) _/ A$ w

[7] Commitment Letter at 16; see also the draft guidance for industry Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format — Receipt Dates (Feb. 2014). These submissions are deemed to be submitted to FDA on the day when transmission to the electronic submission gateway is completed, except when the submission arrives on a weekend, Federal holiday, or a day when the FDA office that will review the submission is otherwise not open for business.   In that case, the submission is deemed to be submitted on the next day when that office is open for business.


& y, _" B$ G# r/ L3 c( A- j. J. L+ l0 Q$ B9 u( e& m8 K7 V

[8] Commitment Letter at 10

) ]1 D% f6 w1 p' M+ w
( T" y; w; f- S- t. S

[9] Commitment Letter at 10.


6 S9 S/ @& V9 A" \- q% p% L3 e6 }/ l1 @% S6 K9 A

[10] The phrase delaying amendment refers to an amendment that is the result of a delaying action. As explained in this guidance, the performance metric for a delaying amendment (3 months) is actually shorter than the metric for a nondelaying amendment (12 months). These terms are used to reflect their use in the Commitment Letter.

' a2 C# ^: Q8 S

' h8 Y8 m* Z, r$ l* z$ ~. P. M5 G

[11] Commitment Letter at 10 and 14.


  f' v6 u/ M5 d  f) b6 K9 w. o5 S
+ O6 ]7 J  P7 {" w+ I7 @1 ^6 `9 j

[12] For example, if a CP requests certain BE data be submitted to support an ANDA for a particular drug product and FDA grants that petition, an ANDA applicant may submit the BE data reflected in the CP response prior to FDA’s request of the data from the ANDA applicant. Such amendment would be considered a Tier 1 delaying amendment.


3 F3 u. M: W! o! e7 p
% A$ s, W7 t% K$ t$ n% ]

[13] Commitment Letter at 10.


0 K# d3 Q. }9 D' z9 @7 X8 i& [+ j% H& X2 E. z- z

[14] Id. at 10

; `$ j% m) d+ t& [3 H, y

5 J- k: i3 {3 X6 _

[15] We note that certain information that may be submitted in a patent amendment may require further and more detailed review. For example, additional review may be required if an ANDA applicant submits a patent amendment notifying FDA that it is not seeking approval for a method of use protected by patent or exclusivity by the RLD under section 505(j)(2)(A)(viii) of the FD&C Act. When submitting a patent amendment, applicants should consider whether the submission contains any additional information that would be classified as a nondelaying Tier 2 amendment.


& G% e/ r, g& h9 L6 n" L
7 Y3 d7 p. V  y# |

[16] The Commitment Letter uses the terms incremental and additive. FDA interprets both terms as having the same meaning for purposes of determining goal dates.


% B: e/ C3 I$ Y0 ?2 `
+ K1 T3 g+ f2 G5 w; }; B8 c

[17] Commitment Letter at 10.

: T% M. M1 c# A7 x5 F

& K; V2 D1 E2 d5 _2 n

[18] Id. at 10-12.

9 |8 W2 W4 J9 q" q( u/ f0 ?% v  y0 i" A
2 P. S* {& F8 t6 H

[19] As stated elsewhere in this document, delaying amendments are all unsolicited amendments indicated by applicant and agreed by FDA to be a result of either delaying actions or that would eventually be solicited.


- `7 i( m& N1 G. E3 S- k: Z
% g) w2 N% ^* @& A4 K$ l

[20] An action on a submission can be FDA issuing a CR letter, an approval letter, a tentative approval letter, or a refuse-to-receive action. Commitment Letter at 14.

2 F6 r& Q+ Z, W  a1 L

# E) _8 w' u- t! j

[21] Consistent with our interpretation of “from the date of” submission under the FD&C Act and our regulations, we interpret this language in the Commitment Letter to mean that calculation of the goal date starts on the receipt date   of the submission (see footnote 9). Also, according to the language in the Commitment Letter, we will calculate the goal date in months. We note that this calculation differs from the calculation of goal dates agreed to under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) as set forth in the PDUFA Commitment Letter, which contains different language from the language in the GDUFA Commitment Letter. See PDUFA Commitment Letter, available athttp://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/UCM270412.pdf.

2 |+ @1 b. L0 ]' N9 K& x" r

; }0 n" h) _+ v( @

[22] Commitment Letter at 14.


4 n; V5 d7 L# m/ l& }$ {* k2 l) s# q& d: n+ w

[23] Id. at 10 and 14.

# c8 E5 q- L! U& h

) Y. q% p0 s+ \9 `; A
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

沙发
 楼主| 一场梦 发表于 2014-10-17 12:45:29 | 只看该作者
【转载】20140709 ANDA sub-Amendments and Easily Correctable Def. under GDUFA(2/3)  

2014-10-16 23:03:01|  分类: FDA|举报|字号 [url=]订阅[/url]

, F; w6 N0 h$ N. d, B6 E+ K

- `, e# G$ ^2 A$ M! E6 t) t- Y) {. G6 X
6 ^" [: m) E2 o) _' K8 h  e( f

$ _" G( _- p4 O) y0 S; i2 h$ y
; d+ H. Y1 G/ O8 b6 P! f2 J
  % n" n) I" G% }6 ~4 L( m4 a
[url=]B.  How Are the Amendment Goals Applied?[/url]修订目标是如何应用的?
1 r5 U: j# r( v3 B9 \
" H$ @  O) P7 B6 Y& X  t3 e

Performance metric goals are applied to the date of submission of the amendment; amendment goals may or may not change the original ANDA’s review goal date.[1] Amendments submitted during the application review either extend or do not change the ANDA goal date.


0 M4 N- E- R( U

绩效指标应用于修订递交的日期,修订目标可能会改变原始ANDA审核的目标日期.申请审核期间递交的修订不会延迟或者改变ANDA目标日期.

& }/ T' ?0 W6 l+ a" y: u. Y. M
1.   Which amendments are subject to the performance metric goals described in this guidance?哪些修订受到本指南中描述的绩效指标的影响?$ {5 R: ?' H" @' Y
; G4 `% V9 n9 f' B, q( ^

The cohort year of the original ANDA or PAS determines the subsequent amendment’s performance metric goals.  Only ANDAs and PASs filed in cohort years 3 through 5 (FYs 2015, 2016, and 2017) are assigned goal dates.  Accordingly, the amendment goal dates apply to only those applications filed in cohort years 3 through 5.  In other words, the amendment performance metric goals described in this guidance do not apply to an amendment submitted in FY 2015, 2016, or 2017 if the original ANDA or PAS was submitted before FY 2015.


7 l* w( n* _# X  a3 l6 u

原始ANDA或者PAS在哪年递交将决定随后修订的绩效指标.只有在第三年和第五年期间(即财政年2015,2016和2017)申请的ANDAs和PASs才指定目标日期。因此,修订的目标日期也只适用于在第三年至第五年期间提交的申请。换而言之,在财政年2015,,2016和2017递交的修订,如果其原始ANDA和PAS在财政年2015年之前递交,本指南中的修订的绩效指标将不适用。


9 o& ?* F6 R0 h. S7 ]! z: L2 N

Example: An original application is filed on September 1, 2014. On September 1, 2015, the applicant submits an unsolicited amendment to its pending application.  Neither the application nor the amendment has goal dates.

7 Q- p+ c1 e: F) {1 r9 W9 e$ D* e

例如:一份原始申请在2014年9月1日递交。在2015年9月1日,申请人针对这份待批准的申请递交了一份主动修订。这份申请和其修订均没有目标期限。


5 [$ v% |3 L7 D9 `- \2 T

Example: An original application is filed on September 1, 2014. On September 1, 2015, FDA issues a CR letter. On March 1, 2016, the applicant submits a CR amendment to the application. No goal date is assigned to this amendment.

; [) C1 I. a& c! L

例如:一份原始申请在2014年9月1日递交。在2015年9月1日,FDA发布了一份CR不足信。在2016年3月1日,申请人递交了CR不足信的修订。该修订将不会指定目标日期

1 p8 \3 b2 u0 L0 T

Performance metric goals apply only to amendments submitted electronically.[2]


* u7 ^8 C/ x. x

绩效指标仅适用于电子递交的修订

' g! x8 G& [' k

2.   For purposes of applying the GDUFA performance metric goals, are cohort years assigned by date of submission of the ANDA or the most recent amendment to the ANDA?为了应用GDUFA绩效指标,年份应该按照ANDA递交日期来指定还是按照最新修订递交的日期来指定?  ]) R, V# @0 r) S6 b( y- m4 i( v


4 W$ r. i0 m5 Q  V1 Y8 i2 @

Cohort years are assigned by date of submission of the original ANDA.  Once an ANDA is submitted and designated a particular cohort year, the submission of a subsequent amendment does not change the cohort year.[3] Any additional review times resulting from the submission of amendments may be added to the original goal date.  In no case, does the submission of an amendment shorten the goal date for that ANDA.


: |/ |) C6 L- Y

年份是按照原始ANDA递交的日期来指定的.ANDA一旦递交并被指定了具体的年份,随后递交的修订不会改变该年份。任何因为递交修订增加的审核时间可能会累积到原来的目标审核日期。但是递交修订不会缩短ANDA的目标审核日期。

& j* d4 K; g/ k0 l, g; ~

Because amendment performance goals are incremental and may extend the original goal date, and because submission of multiple amendments may result in a Tier 3 classification with no GDUFA metric goals, FDA strongly encourages applicants to submit complete applications, making later amendments unnecessary.

% \6 h' z  g" f4 W: K

由于修订的绩效目标是增长的并且可能延迟原来的目标日期,同时由于多个修订的递交可能导致修订被划分为层次3,进而失去GDUFA指标,FDA强烈建议申请人递交完整的申请,以避免后期修订。


' C. O$ G3 r9 p) f+ C3.   When will an application lose its goal date?一份申请何时会失去它的目标日期?$ {  U1 b- U% `2 x7 i! b# T  O
) z4 ~, i; Z0 s+ g

If an applicant submits an amendment and that amendment is classified as a Tier 3 amendment (e.g., the 2nd major amendment or 6th minor amendment), the ANDA will lose its goal date.


4 \5 D3 X" O: Z9 ?

如果一份申请递交了一份修订,该修订被划分为层次3的修订(例如,第二个重大的修订或者第六个次要的修订),该ANDA将失去它的目标日期。

, q3 d" C5 N  T* W& r' m! x& C

Example:  In response to a CR letter, an applicant submits an amendment (CR amendment) that is classified as a Tier 1 solicited major amendment. FDA reviews the amendment and, in a second CR letter, identifies major deficiencies that must be corrected before approval. When the applicant submits a second major amendment in response to the second CR letter, the application loses its goal date.

" ?: @2 f! {$ R' H5 g2 u0 ^0 V

例如:为了回复CR不足信,申请者递交了一份修订(CR修订)被划分为层次1的被动的重大修订。FDA审核了该修订并且在下一封CR不足信中指出了在批准前必须改正的重要缺陷项。当申请人针对这封CR不足信再次递交重大修订时,该申请就失去了它的目标日期。


9 H! D8 E6 n5 R+ K$ N6 `$ @

Example:  In response to a CR letter, an applicant submits an amendment that is classified as a Tier 1 solicited minor amendment.  FDA reviews the amendment and, in a second CR letter, identifies major deficiencies that must be corrected before the application may be approved.  The applicant submits a second CR amendment that is classified as a Tier 1 solicited major amendment. FDA reviews the amendment and, in a third CR letter, identifies major deficiencies that remain uncorrected.  When the applicant submits the second major amendment in response to the third CR letter, the application loses its goal date.

4 u4 Z" o5 M5 R! q+ f

例如:为了回复CR不足信,申请人递交了一份修订,被划分为层次1的被动的次要修订。FDA审核了该修订并且发布了另一封CR不足信,指出该申请批准前必须改正的重大缺陷项。申请人递交了第二份CR不足信的修订,被划分为层次1的被动的重大修订。FDA审核了该修订,并且发布了第三封CR不足信,指出仍未改正的重大缺陷项。当申请人针对第三封CR不足信再一次递交重大修订时,该申请就失去了它的目标日期。


* G+ \0 l: r, p% _% r+ {3 ^4.   How are goal dates calculated when an amendment is submitted before a CR letter is issued?修订在CR不足信发布前递交,如何计算目标日期?
# s5 S: A8 X4 h- k) p' J

8 p5 G0 ?$ J* [1 i5 x0 @7 m7 n

An amendment submitted before a CR letter is issued adjusts the goal date for the original application and is additive.  Subsequent amendments submitted before a CR letter is issued also adjust the goal date for the application and are additive.[4] FDA has discretion to accept an unsolicited amendment submitted during the review cycle and adjust the goal date for the application. In the alternative, FDA may defer review of the unsolicited amendment, issue the CR letter, and review the unsolicited amendment when the applicant submits the CR amendment. If review of a Tier 2 unsolicited amendment is deferred, the goal date is adjusted to 12 months from the date of submission of the CR amendment.


/ q& C; \  U4 h2 n4 X

CR不足信发布前递交的修订将调整原始申请的目标日期[url=]并且是增加日期[/url]。随后在CR不足信发布之前递交的修订也将调整申请的目标日期并且是增加日期。FDA有权在审核周期内接收主动修订并调整申请的目标日期。另外的情况下,FDA可能会延迟审核主动修订,先发布CR不足信,当申请人递交CR不足信的修订时再审核该主动修订。如果归属为层次2的主动修订被推迟审核,目标日期将被调整至自递交CR不足信修订之日起的12个月内。

* u, C+ s) Y* L8 m

Example: An unsolicited amendment with a 12-month review metric submitted 4 months prior to the original goal date adds 8 months to the review clock.


+ T6 Q( t1 V7 E; R

例如:一份12个月审核指标的主动修订,在原始目标日期前4个月递交,将增加8个月的审核时间。

3 M5 w8 _7 @0 b7 @

Example: A delaying amendment with a 3-month review metric submitted 4 months prior to the original goal date does not alter the review clock.

" I/ c3 z8 r" U: n7 }

例如:一个3个月审核指标的延迟修订,在原始目标日期前4个月递交,将不会改变审核日期。


& P; H: Q: Z1 r! D: s4 i4 u

Example: An unsolicited amendment with a 12-month review metric submitted 1 month prior to the original goal date is deferred until after FDA issues the CR letter and the applicant submits the corresponding CR amendment. The new goal date for the CR amendment and the unsolicited amendment is 12 months from the date of the CR amendment.

; M7 J9 z) y7 P1 u* O7 ^

例如:12个月审核指标的一个主动修订,在原始目标日期前1个月递交,但是审核被FDA推迟至发布CR不足信且申请人递交该不足信的修订之后。该CR不足信的修订新的目标日期以及主动修订的目标日期将是自CR不足信递交之日起的12个月。


* ~0 B8 T* l$ \( H  T

Example: A delaying amendment with a 3-month review metric is submitted 1 month prior to the original goal date.  FDA adds 2 months to the review clock and reviews the delaying amendment before taking action on the application.

$ e  u: t8 ~* \( A( |. W

例如:3个月审核指标的延迟修订,在原始目标日期前1个月递交。FDA将增加2个月的审核期并且将在处理该申请之前审核延迟的修订。

) I0 R7 k9 u  D/ T
5.   How are goal dates calculated when an amendment is submitted in response to a CR letter?如果递交的修订是用于回复CR不足信,将如何计算目标日期?6 o  Z$ L2 d, D8 P# m( i+ O
* q4 ^: n- _  j1 A

Generally, an amendment submitted after a CR letter is issued sets a new goal date for the application and subsequent amendments submitted after the CR letter is issued also adjust the goal date for the application and are additive.[5]


# y' i9 U+ [3 ]4 `, r. u

一般情况下,CR不足信发布之后递交的修订,为原申请建立了新的目标审核日期。随后在CR不足信发布后递交的修订也将调整申请的目标审核日期并且是累加的。


: ?+ I/ _7 o/ _% W0 [" Q

Example:  A CR amendment is submitted in response to minor deficiencies identified in a CR letter.  It is the application’s second solicited minor amendment.  That amendment has a 3-month metric from the date of submission.

, n+ U8 k) D, V

例如:一份递交的CR不足信的修订,用以回复CR不足信中指出的次要缺陷项。该修订属于申请的第二个被动的次要修订。这样的修订自递交日起有3个月的指标。


" X. N8 l1 \6 n2 [1 j

Example:  An applicant submits a CR major amendment, which has a 10-month review metric.  In month 4 of FDA’s review of the major CR amendment, the applicant submits an unsolicited amendment; that amendment has a 12-month metric that is added to the date of submission, adding 6 months to the original goal date.


# K9 C0 d% ~; |4 I, ?6 z' p* C! B# V

例如:申请人递交了一份CR不足信的重大修订,有10个月的审核指标。在这份修订审核的第四个月,申请人递交了一份主动修订自递交之日起有12个月的指标,该主动修订使得原来的目标日期增加了6个月。


4 M/ d  [# T! v# h4 [, T  O- v. t6.   What happens when there are multiple factors affecting the goal date calculation?当存在多个影响因素时,如何计算目标日期?- R! G& a! c  q! }
! J4 u1 z8 E9 B0 A6 {

If an amendment contains multiple elements, the longest goal date applies to the review goal.[6]


) d3 W2 |; P4 m( \

如果一份修订包含了多个因素,取其中最长的目标期限作为审核目标。


" M" @* z8 W% S4 z% y1 I: ]7.   How are goal dates calculated when an applicant submits an amendment to an original ANDA before the ANDA has been received?在ANDA接收之前递交了该原始ANDA的修订,应如何计算目标日期?; v  h. @2 r3 I) t/ L# ?
/ p3 e% X2 d% \% v; k% P

Amendments submitted during filing review of the ANDA are classified as Tier 2 unsolicited amendments.  If the ANDA is submitted in the year-3 or year-4 cohort[7] and is received, review of the ANDA and the unsolicited amendment will have a 15-month goal date because the longest goal date applies (in this case, the goal date for the ANDA). If the ANDA is submitted in the year-5 cohort and is received, review of the ANDA and the unsolicited amendment will have a 12-month goal date from the date of submission of the unsolicited amendment.

9 T: i9 f& v1 {5 \

在ANDA归档审核期间递交的修订被划分为层次2的主动修订.如果ANDA是在第三年或者第四年递交并被接收,ANDA和主动修订的审核将有15个月的目标期限,因为15个月是最长的目标期限(在本例中,最长的期限是ANDA的目标期限).如果ANDA在第五年递交并且被接收,ANDA和主动修订的审核自修订递交之日起有12个月的目标期限.

! N6 O, s. v) i, S5 Y! L! c6 p

Example:  An applicant submits an original ANDA on October 1, 2016 (year-5 cohort).  On November 1, 2016, during filing review of the ANDA, the applicant submits an unsolicited amendment to the ANDA.  The goal date for that ANDA is adjusted from July 31, 2017 (10-month review metric for year-5 cohort ANDAs), to October 31, 2017, which is 12 months from the date of submission of the unsolicited amendment.

: E4 V4 A, o5 m( P2 c& {! w

例如:申请人在2016年10月1日(第五年)递交了一份原始的ANDA,.在2016年11月1日,ANDA归档审核期间,申请人递交了一份主动修订.该ANDA的目标日期从2017年7月31日(第五年递交的ANDA审核指标为10个月)调整为2017年10月31日,自主动修订递交之日起12个月.

5 H0 r# I, x- ]" j8 e) }
8.   How are goal dates calculated when an applicant submits an unsolicited amendment after a CR letter is issued but before the applicant responds to the CR letter?申请人在CR不足信发布之后,回复CR不足信之前递交的修订,应如何计算审核的目标期限?8 D( W3 d3 k( I' ?& Z4 n

* w. Q& P% l9 ^9 c4 ~) c( }& \  A

Review of any Tier 2 unsolicited amendments received in the period between FDA’s issuance of a CR letter and the applicant’s submission of its CR amendment is deferred until the CR amendment is received.  The application will be assigned a 12-month metric calculated from the date of submission of the CR amendment.


% k" o5 ]) D* b& ?, S

在FDA发布不足信到申请人递交不足信回复期间,收到的所有层次2的主动修订均被推迟到收到CR不足信的回复之后.申请将被指定12个月的指标,自接收到CR不足信的递交日期算起.

3 S6 }/ W5 I1 [. n2 d5 `

Example: An applicant receives a CR letter identifying several minor deficiencies.  Before submitting the CR amendment, the applicant submits an unsolicited non-delaying amendment.  FDA will defer review of the unsolicited non-delaying amendment until the applicant submits a CR amendment that responds to the deficiencies identified in the CR letter. The CR amendment is considered the applicant’s second minor amendment and is subject to a 3-month review metric.  However, based on the unsolicited non-delaying amendment, the goal date is adjusted to 12 months calculated from the date of submission of the CR amendment, because the longest applicable goal date applies.

( [/ U' ], n/ r# \

例如:申请人收到CR不足信,不足信指出若干次要缺陷.在递交CR不足信的修订之前,申请人递交了一份主动的非延迟性修订.FDA将推迟审核该修订,直到申请人递交CR不足信的修订回复缺陷项.该CR不足信的修订是申请人递交的第二份次要修订,有3个月的审核指标.但是,按照最长期限的原则,基于主动的非延迟修订,该审核目标期限被调整为12个月,自接收到CR不足信的修订之日算起.

7 d  A: `; _* a. J6 W" m
9.   How are goal dates calculated for amendments to tentatively approved applications?对于临时批准申请的修订,如何计算目标日期?
3 B& \7 x- |! W1 T3 D& N- M) Z; w8 t

3 w5 H" `0 I7 [9 W% U

According to the Commitment Letter, a request for final approval is an example of an administrative amendment.[8] If an applicant has made no changes to product or process since the tentative approval was granted, FDA would not need to dedicate a significant amount of resources to ensure the product is eligible for final approval and would not set a new goal date for review.  Most standard requests for final approval, in which few or no changes have been made to the application since the tentative approval, including acceptable compliance (good manufacturing practices (GMP)) status of applicable facilities, will be reviewed in approximately 3 months.  However, if, in the time between tentative approval and the request for final approval, the applicant has made changes to product or process (i.e., change in validation procedures, change in manufacturing facilities), this information may warrant a more thorough review.  Thus, if an applicant with a tentatively approved application requests final approval, but includes information in the amendment that would cause the amendment to meet the definition of an unsolicited non-delaying amendment, FDA will consider the amendment to be both a request for final approval and an unsolicited non-delaying amendment, which would set a goal of 12  months. As explained in the Commitment Letter[9] and question 6 of this section, the longest applicable review date will apply to amendments with multiple elements.

9 v: [# I1 |" h' z1 ]" [

根据承诺书的描述,申请ANDA最终批准是行政修订的一个例子.如果申请在被临时批准之后,申请人没有对产品或者工艺进行变更,FDA就没有必要将大量的资源花费在确认产品符合最终批准的工作上,将不会设定新的目标审核日期.大部分标准的最终批准的申请,自临时批准后少有或者没有变更,并且拥有合适的符合可接受状态(符合良好的生产管理规范)的生产设施,该申请将在大约3个月的时间内被审核.此外,如果在临时批准到申请最终批准期间,申请人对产品或者工艺进行了变更(例如验证程序的变更,生产设施的变更),该变更信息需要保证更周密的审核.因此对于已经得到临时批准的申请,如果申请人申请最终批准,但是修订中包含的信息使该修订符合主动的非延迟修订的定义,FDA认为该修订既是一份最终批准的申请,同时也是一份主动的非延迟的修订,这份修订将被设定12个月的目标期限.按照承诺信的描述,以及本部分问题6,对于多个因素的修订目标日期将取其中最长的.


8 T- T: ~2 h  h. @

OGD staff will review the content of the request for final approval to determine whether the submission is classified as an administrative amendment or as a Tier 2 unsolicited non-delaying amendment.  If the amendment is classified as a Tier 2 unsolicited non-delaying amendment, OGD will act upon the amendment within 12 months from receipt.


7 N+ b2 Q8 N, q: r

OGD的员工将审核最终批准的申请,判断该申请属于行政修订还是层次2的主动的非延迟性修订.如果该修订被划分为层次2的主动的非延迟修订,OGD将自接收之日起在12个月内进行处理.

( I/ Y' V7 M+ z1 A3 r  U2 @: ^3 y

Example: An applicant was granted tentative approval to an original application submitted after October 1, 2014, and submits on August 1, 2017, a request for final approval that identifies a change in the manufacturing facility. FDA will have until July 31, 2018, to review the request for final approval.


# B: o  L$ t- q3 `$ v

例如,一份2014年10月1日之后递交的原始申请获得了临时批准,申请人在2017年8月1日递交了一份最终批准的申请,申请表明有一个生产设施的变更.FDA直到2018年7月31日才会审核该申请.

" |3 F5 B) _/ b7 l- F" \

Example: An applicant was granted tentative approval to an original application submitted after October 1, 2014, and submits on August 1, 2017, a request for final approval that includes a Tier 1 delaying amendment (e.g., RLD labeling update).  FDA will have until October 31, 2017, to review the delaying amendment and the request for final approval.


8 s6 h: g3 N# k

例如:一份2014年10月1日之后递交的原始申请获得了临时批准,申请人在2017年8月1日递交了一份最终批准的申请,申请包含了一份层次1的延迟性申请(例如RLD标签的升级).FDA直到2017年10月31日才会审核该申请.

: `4 _+ j( P, u& P  u( n7 \& K
10. If my application qualifies for expedited review, what is the impact of that expedited status on the GDUFA metric goals for any subsequent amendments?如果我的申请获得加速审核的资格,对随后修订的GDUFA的审核指标的目标有什么影响?
% u* O: r" K1 ]* E

+ u+ S  p8 D4 s9 h- Y

As stated in the Commitment Letter, certain submissions may be granted expedited review. Amendments to expedited applications are subject to GDUFA performance metric goals in the same way as amendments to nonexpedited applications.  If a submission has been granted expedited status, review may be completed before the applicable GDUFA goal date.


' I% L8 T) ^- J6 t! d7 i; M" x

按照承诺信的说明,某些递交可能被授予加速审核.该类申请的修订GDUFA的绩效指标与未被批准加速审核申请的修订是一样的.如果递交的申请已经被授予加速状态,审核可能在应用GDUFA目标日期前就完成审核.

  ]2 a8 b7 j  K) s' [
11. Under what circumstances can FDA change the classification of an applicant’s CR amendment?何种情况下FDA可能变更CR不足信修订的分类?, X; }0 H& h/ h
0 i$ d2 M7 S# A- J

The type, quantity, or complexity of data submitted in an amendment may prompt a change in classification of the amendment to ensure appropriate allocation of FDA resources for review. All initial classifications and changes to classifications will be made at FDA’s discretion. A CR letter will advise the applicant whether the CR amendment will be classified as a major or minor amendment.  However, if the applicant submits a CR amendment that contains additional information or data beyond what was identified in the CR letter as necessary to correct the deficiency or deficiencies identified in the CR letter, FDA will change the classification of the amendment from a Tier 1 solicited major or minor amendment to a Tier 2 unsolicited amendment.


7 l5 z' {4 i! m. P/ i

修订中递交的数据的类型,数量和复杂程度可能促使修订分类的变更,以确保合理分配FDA的审核资源.FDA将自行决定所有最初的分类以及分类的变更.CR不足信将告知申请人该不足信的修订将被划分为重大还是次要修订. 但是,如果申请人递交的CR不足信的修订包含了额外的信息或者数据,这些信息或者数据超出了CR不足信中改正缺陷项或者不足所需要的信息或者数据,FDA将变更该修订的分类,从层次1的被动的重大或者次要修订变更为层次2的主要修订.

6 `5 R  I" Q; \. E

Example: An applicant receives a CR letter identifying certain deficiencies in an application.  The CR letter states that the CR amendment will be considered a minor amendment with a 3-month review metric (Tier 1). The applicant submits an amendment and identifies it as a minor CR amendment. However, in lieu of correcting a deficiency using the strength of the drug product that is the subject of the application, the applicant elects to use a new strength.  Data supporting the new strength are included in the CR amendment. FDA changes the classification of this amendment from Tier 1 minor amendment to a Tier 2 unsolicited amendment with a 12-month review metric.

3 p1 z! t$ @: s6 _$ X7 B5 ^

例如:申请人接收到CR不足信,不足信指出了某些申请中的不足.CR不足信中声明该不足信的修订将被分类为次要修订,有3个月的审核指标(层次1).申请人递交了一份修订且确认这是一份次要的CR不足信的修订. 但是,申请人为了改正缺陷项,使用了一个新的产品规格,代替原来申请中的产品规格.CR不足信中包含的数据是针对该新规格的.FDA将变更改修订的类型,从层次1的次要修订变更为层次2的主动修订,将拥有12个月的审核指标.


! G$ o3 h* x6 b$ p% r

FDA’s reclassification of a minor or major CR amendment to an unsolicited amendment will not affect the amendment count that would have applied to the amendment if the sponsor had not submitted additional information. For example, if the CR letter advises a sponsor that the responsive amendment will be classified as a minor amendment, and the sponsor submits an amendment with additional elements that FDA reclassifies as a Tier 2 unsolicited amendment, the amendment will still count toward the sponsor’s total minor amendment count.


1 Y5 @6 x; ~  c; Y8 h/ b5 v8 B1 _5 d

如果申请人没有递交额外的信息,FDA将次要或者主要的CR不足信的修订再次分类为未被要求的修订不会影响修订的数量.例如,CR不足信通知申请人回复该不足信的修订将被分类为次要修订申请人递交了额外的信息,FDA将修订重新分类为层次2的未被要求的修订,该修订仍会被计入申请人总的次要修订数量中.


6 B) \' B2 Z% l, q12. Under what circumstances can FDA change the classification of an applicant’s ECD response?在何种情况下,FDA可能变更ECD修订的分类?; g/ g# T, u: m! I

$ D& Y8 G- j0 L% r  G. C

If a response to an ECD is not provided within 10 business days from the request, FDA may reissue the ECD as a minor deficiency in the CR letter upon completion of the current review cycle.  Furthermore, if the response to an ECD was filed within 10 business days but contains information requiring more extensive review than is typically required of ECDs, the amendment will be classified as a minor amendment and the goal date adjusted accordingly.


% ^: S: [% G5 S% @+ g

Example: An applicant fails to submit their ECD response within 10 business days from the request.  In its discretion, FDA may defer review of the submission and add the request as a minor amendment to the next CR letter.


; z2 g$ s6 F  U( B

如果ECD的回复自通知之日起,没有在10个工作日内提供,FDA在结束现阶段的审核周期后,会再次发布该ECD,此时的ECD将作为CR不足信的一个次要缺陷项.此外,如果ECD在10个工作日被回复,但是包含的信息,相比较通常的ECDs,需要更多的审核,修订将被归类为次要修订并且相应的目标审核日期将被调整.


/ q/ j* I3 f/ ?0 t1 q6 u

Example: An applicant submits a response to the ECD and that submission contains unsolicited information. FDA will change the classification of the ECD response to a Tier 2 unsolicited non-delaying amendment subject to a 12-month metric, calculated from the date of the newly classified submission.

: e6 b  v: l0 o5 U) X" U5 F

例如:申请人递交了一份ECD的回复,该回复包含未被要求的信息.FDA将变更ECD的回复的分类,划分为层次2的主动的非延迟修订,该修订自递交之日起将有12个月的审核目标.


: y  L- D. _1 s0 h8 \

Example: An applicant submits a response to an ECD within 10 business days from the request. The submission directly responds to the ECD request but does so with information requiring a more extensive review than is typically required of ECDs.  FDA may change the classification of the submission to a minor amendment and set the appropriate goal date based on the amendment count.


4 R9 U0 q' U4 n2 U

例如:申请人在10个工作日内递交了一份ECD的回复.该递交直接回应了这份ECD,但是回复的信息相对于通常的ECD回复需要更多的审核.FDA可能会变更递交的分类为次要修订,并且将基于修订的数量设定合适的目标日期.

' x2 t& A% ?7 r5 [( V9 K$ w# V1 [
13. If an applicant provides a minor CR amendment in response to a CR letter within 10 business days, can FDA classify the submission as an ECD? 如果申请人在10个工作日内提供了一个次要的修订回复CR不足信,FDA可能将递交分类为ECD吗?
1 ?0 {4 `& D9 `: a

: J- e0 z9 t7 F' C! w/ e

As stated earlier, whether a submission is classified as a minor amendment or an ECD depends on the extensiveness of FDA resources required to review the submission. Appendix B provides examples of deficiencies listed by discipline that would generally result in a minor amendment. The information or data necessary to correct these deficiencies require more FDA resources to review than an ECD, so the classification as a minor amendment will not change. We also note that a solicited amendment in response to a CR letter sets a new goal date for that application. Submission of an ECD would not set or adjust the goal date for an application, and in no case can the submission of an amendment shorten the goal date.


# j6 r0 _& ^  x7 l

如先前所说,递交被划分为次要修订还是ECD取决于审核需要多少FDA的资源支出.附件B提供了一份通常需要次要修订的缺陷项的例子,按照学科进行分类.改正这些缺陷项所需的信息或者数据相对于ECD的审核需要更多的FDA资源,因此划分为次要修订的分类将不会变更.我们同时注意到回复CR不足信的被动修订将给原来申请的审核期限设定一个新的目标时间.ECD的递交不会设置新的或者调整申请的目标日期,并且修订的递交不会缩短目标日期.


& C+ K6 E8 n& `6 h

Example: An applicant receives a CR letter noting minor deficiencies that must be addressed. Within 10 business days of receipt of the CR letter, the applicant submits a CR amendment and requests that the submission be classified as an ECD.  Because the CR amendment was classified as a minor amendment in consideration of the FDA resources required to review the submission, FDA will not change the classification of the minor CR amendment.[10]


  s% k# \3 P9 t+ c% X& p( b

例如:申请人收到一份CR不足信,不足信指出必须整改的次要的缺陷项.自接收CR不足信10个工作日内,申请人递交了一份CR不足信的修订并且申请将该修订分类为ECD的修订.由于考虑到审核该修订需要的FDA资源量,该CR不足信被分类为次要修订,FDA不会变更此次要的CR不足信修订的分类.

, E& |: E8 W( o8 p/ J. Y6 }7 ^' e
14. What process will FDA use when changing the classification of amendments?FDA变更修订的分类FDA会走怎样的程序?
: r* N6 k: t8 e$ c/ k
) b  l0 k" D. P3 A" s: F- {8 f

The decision to change the classification of an amendment will be made by the regulatory project manager (RPM) and the ANDA review team in consultation with the appropriate division director. Notification of a change in classification will be provided in writing as soon as is practicable after FDA determines that the change is appropriate. Reconsideration of a decision to change the classification of an amendment may be requested using the process described in section VI of this guidance.


. W& l/ r2 S6 v

修订分类的变更是由管理的项目经理(RPM),ANDA审核小组协同相关部门主管磋商之后决定的.FDA判断该变更可行之后,将尽快以书面形式通知该变更的分类.修订类型变更再议的流程将在本指南VI部分进行描述.


; A/ l. Q+ R, @" ~15. How will FDA handle amendments to applications that are of overall poor quality and amendments of overall poor quality? FDA将如何处理整体质量差的申请的修订以及整体质量差的修订?" g7 ?. S# @/ ?% f; o( i, }

( m5 b- M0 o) U, s' X/ U+ }' c

As stated earlier, an amendment responding to multiple deficiencies that, in the aggregate, requires a substantial expenditure of FDA resources to review will be classified as a solicited major amendment. Such classification will occur if an application is of such overall poor quality that a substantive review cannot be performed with the information or data provided — and the type, quantity, or complexity of the information or data required to correct the identified deficiencies will require extensive review by FDA. Similarly, if an applicant’s amendment responding to minor deficiencies is so poorly crafted that substantive review will require, in FDA’s judgment, a greater expenditure of resources than is traditionally required for review of a minor amendment, FDA will change the classification of the amendment from minor to major.


9 X0 |4 T( \2 O$ J* @2 b* ]9 X

如之前所说,一份针对多个缺陷项的修订,总体来说,需要花费大量的FDA资源来进行审核,将被划分为被动的重大修订.如果一份申请整体质量较差不能根据其中的数据和信息进行实质性的审核,并且纠正缺陷项所需的信息或者数据的类型,数量和复杂程度需要FDA更广泛的审核,将会进行上述分类.同样地,如果申请人回复次要缺陷项的修订质量较差, ,按照FDA的判断,实质性的审核相比较传统的次要修订的审核需要花费更多资源.FDA将变更修订的分类,从次要变更为重大修订.


/ Z! V* w$ |2 l. P, s) Z1 T1 p4 v

FDA may, in its discretion, decide not to change the classification of a minor amendment of overall poor quality if the minor amendment causes the application to lose its goal date.


9 b2 h7 D1 ^$ L3 [) ~

FDA可能自主决定不变更一份整体质量较差的次要修订的分类,如果该次要修订使申请失去目标审核日期.

( R; d$ K. ]" l

Example: An applicant receives a CR letter from FDA identifying multiple deficiencies in the application.  Although each deficiency, by itself, may not require a substantial expenditure of FDA resources to review, the application is of such overall poor quality that FDA determines that review of the CR amendment will require extensive FDA resources.  Assuming this will be the applicant’s first major amendment, FDA classifies this CR amendment as a Tier 1 solicited major amendment with a 10-month review metric.


# d( k' E  n2 p+ I. w, C/ }% k

例如:申请人接收到一封CR不足信,FDA指出了多个申请中的缺陷项.尽管每个缺陷项本身不需要花费FDA大量资源去审核,但是由于这份申请质量如此之差,FDA判断不足信的修订需要花费大量FDA资源去审核. 假设这将是申请人的第一个重大修订,FDA将把该CR不足信的修订划分为层次1的被动的重大修订,有10个月的审核指标.

% V9 Y7 k. I( Y: u

Example: An applicant receives a CR letter from FDA indicating that the amendment should be classified as a minor amendment. Upon review of the CR amendment, FDA finds that the submission is poorly organized, difficult to navigate, and with data not clearly presented.  FDA determines that review of this submission will require a significant expenditure of FDA resources.  FDA will change the classification of the CR amendment from minor to major and notify the applicant of the change in classification and goal date.

, X5 C5 W5 s+ T! m8 R6 b

例如:申请人收到一封CR不足信,FDA指出修订将被划分为次要修订.在审核CR不足信修订的过程中,FDA发现递交的修订组织差,难以处理,并且没有清楚地提供数据.FDA判断该审核将需要花费大量的FDA资源.FDA将变更该CR不足信的分类,次要修订变更为重大修订,并且通知申请人分类的变更及目标日期.


* z3 ^" Z$ F6 J# f

Example:  An applicant submits the 6th minor amendment to its original ANDA. Upon review, FDA determines that the amendment is such overall poor quality, that FDA would normally change the classification to a major amendment. FDA will not change the classification to a major amendment because the application has already lost its goal date.


4 y2 a6 P! @" i, D! z  d2 t

例如:申请人递交了第6个原始ANDA的次要修订.审核过程中,FDA判断该修订质量较差,FDA通常会变更分类为重大修订.本例中,FDA不会将分类变更为重大修订,因为该申请已经失去了目标审核期限.


+ g. d* N/ G9 T16. Which submission types are excepted from the amendment/Tier classification system?哪一些类型的修订不参与修订分层系统?
, ?0 y: B' I2 |/ |

4 Z6 t, v/ m: V5 Z

Because positron emission tomography (PET) applications are not subject to the fee collecting provisions of GDUFA,[11] the Tier review classifications and performance metric goals do not apply to amendments submitted to PET applications. Similarly, the performance metric goals do not apply to changes being effected (CBE) supplements, which do not require the payment of a fee under GDUFA.

; z! P. l4 N) o  \0 ^

由于正电子成像术(PET)的申请不受GDUFA收费规定的约束,34因此分层审核分类和绩效指标的目标不适用于PET申请的修订.同样地,绩效指标也不适用于待批准变更(CBE)的修订,CBE的修订不需要按照GDUFA支付费用.


6 ]8 d7 F* n* |. i7 e- `17. How will FDA determine if an inspection is necessary? FDA如何判断检查是否必要?
! j- j4 D# D: M+ _  w

4 K( B3 a5 }( S) K4 @  A0 g* R, Q

If an applicant submits a Tier 1 amendment that includes information on a new facility or a facility that is being used for a new purpose, the amendment will be assigned a 10-month metric to allow time for an inspection.  If an applicant submits a Tier 2 amendment that includes information on a new facility or a facility that is being used for a new purpose, the amendment will be assigned a 12-month metric, as the longest goal date applies.

$ R$ |3 I( I6 @  ~* i: T

如果申请人递交了一份层次1的修订,包含新设施的信息,或者原来的设施用于新的使用目的,该修订将被指定10个月的指标确保有时间视察.如果申请人递交了一份层次2的修订,包含新设施的信息,或者原来的设施用于新的使用目的,该修订将被指定12个月的指标,,12个月是最长的目标期限。


0 c+ l: q: X6 g1 [. P1 ]' }2 l

Example: An applicant submits its first minor (Tier 1) amendment in response to a CR letter (3-month goal) but the manufacturing site requires an inspection (10- month goal).  The amendment will have a 10-month review metric.

, J& {" H$ ?7 j" [' ]

例如:申请人递交了第一个次要修订(层次1)回复CR不足信(3个月的审核目标),但是生产场地需要视察(10个月的目标).该修订将拥有10个月的审核指标.


: C5 G( o5 Q, R$ @' J5 H! Z+ o

Example: An applicant submits a Tier 1 solicited minor amendment. However, in response to the CR letter, the CR amendment contains information on a facility that is being used for a new packaging line.  If the facility requires an inspection, a 10-month review metric will be assigned.

: J" d+ u( I' d: y/ h. P

例如:申请人递交了一个层次1的被动的次要修订.但是,回复CR不足信的修订中包含了设施的信息,该设施将被用于一条新的包装线.如果设施需要视察,修订将被指定10个月的审核指标.


* t: G9 H4 ]" U, N, c5 n, n% v! s

Example: An applicant submits a Tier 2 nondelaying amendment that contains information on a new manufacturing site.  The amendment will have a 12-month review metric.


; @- T6 T2 x& ]7 z* r+ x! G  t* l

例如:申请人递交了一个层次2的非延迟申请,包含了新生产设施的信息.该修订将会拥有12个月的审核指标.

2 h6 \- J* I' ^) d

6 P; N" [0 O8 k* y4 f* ^( Z
1 N' g4 q0 J, \7 o7 @' A6 S& h8 m- x" ?( J/ H5 q/ l
- e' {, r7 v, g- |: S1 A


6 O$ {8 h2 D. g5 I5 E6 f7 c6 J; T7 E0 I5 }

  Q, G. w7 D& c+ Y- s

[1] Id. at 10


5 r! r, X+ f( K# s0 B& t: e1 Z' k. @! T2 ^

[2] Commitment Letter at 7.


& o, }* H1 B( H/ K8 G* V9 i' E8 N0 U2 l$ A6 K+ b& _

[3] Id. at 10..


% B. W7 M1 P: K/ a2 s
2 o3 n# e6 x) `( q& [* @* y9 T

[4] Id. at 10.


1 L/ _1 Z' H$ d1 N3 t5 }8 Q* J" u5 ?8 k1 m+ Z& _" q2 q5 w4 F

[5] Id. at 10.

4 N$ i- r7 {+ I% A
  C" J1 O2 o. M( i3 o/ e

[6] Commitment Letter at 10.

% T0 s0 q1 r9 z
9 i2 w4 I! o2 L2 }" G

[7] As stated in the Commitment Letter at page 9: FDA will review and act on 60%t of original ANDA submissions within 15 months from the date of submission for the year-3 cohort. FDA will review and act on 75% of original ANDA submissions within 15 months from the date of submission of the year-4 cohort. FDA will review and act on 90% of original ANDA submissions within 10 months from the date of submission for the year-5 cohort.


+ t4 v9 {$ W# V9 z/ U& S1 Y9 ?/ @' s* w0 D% Q" R9 v

[8] Commitment Letter at 10.

) O$ `/ r( I4 m1 K  ~6 m

! A, B  W' t- ~

[9] Commitment Letter at 10.


6 b/ u( `2 ~/ ~" |& D
3 p" V' c. ~6 B9 w$ \# N! h

[10] In this guidance, FDA describes the process for requesting reconsideration of amendment classification.  Applicants can only request reconsideration of a major amendment. It is not possible to change the classification of  a minor amendment to an ECD because an ECD is not part of the amendment Tier structure under GDUFA and, furthermore, because the review cycle has been closed by FDA by taking the action of issuing the complete response letter.

5 C4 ?. Y8 f. J2 K' \0 u0 J

0 y4 Y1 \2 ]) j0 b

[11] FD&C Act at section 744B(l) (21 U.S.C. 379j–42(l)).


/ [: s( U- U+ N( R
5 Y; b- p+ Y( P) i% h7 G+ n
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册  

本版积分规则

QQ|手机版|药群论坛 ( 蜀ICP备15007902号 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-29 09:23 PM , Processed in 0.130718 second(s), 18 queries .

本论坛拒绝任何人以任何形式在本论坛发表与中华人民共和国法律相抵触的言论! X3.2

© 2011-2014 免责声明:药群网所有内容仅代表发表者个人观点,不代表本论坛立场。

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表